Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+FS\:\s+Omni\s+VI\s+\+\.\.\.\.excellent\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "rr1632" <rr1632@dragonbbs.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:12:38 -0400
FS: Omni VI + with the factory installed DSP Option 3....face is pristine perfect...case has a very small nick on the right side..otherwise excellent....even the backside and heatsink are practically
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00640.html (6,990 bytes)

2. [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
K8ML posted: "FS: Omni VI + with the factory installed DSP Option 3" Sorry Mark, but the Omni VI+ didn't need the "factory installed DSP Option 3". Perhaps it's an Omni VI? 73, Barry N1EU ___________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00646.html (7,125 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "rr1632" <rr1632@dragonbbs.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:04:27 -0400
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00647.html (8,262 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
K8ML commented "the ad states model 563...thats why you mail me?...to correct my ad...???...why waste your time and mine" No Mark, actually this was your ad: "FS: Omni VI + with the factory installed
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00650.html (8,244 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "rr1632" <rr1632@dragonbbs.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:44:35 -0400
Barry, I hope you feel better now that you corrected me....guys like you "need" the last word...sleep better tonight OM...someone "knew" what I was saying...the rig sold....ML-- Original Message -- F
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00654.html (9,247 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 11:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Inaccuracies on a public forum SHOULD be corrected. It has nothing to do with getting the last word. 73, Barry N1EU __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s ne
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00655.html (10,084 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "rr1632" <rr1632@dragonbbs.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:01:21 -0400
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00656.html (11,063 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:11:26 -0400
ML You sound defensive enough to know what you did was wrong. Barry certainly IS correct to bring your public error up for correction. Should make the users aware to scrutinize your ad's more closely
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00657.html (12,310 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:14:13 +0000
Since that is your view, Barry, your comments should be corrected to "Inaccuracies in a public forum..." Dave K8MN _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00658.html (8,145 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "rr1632" <rr1632@dragonbbs.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:45:00 -0400
this was the 3 rd place that I ran an ad for the VI,,Op 3 ...the others plainly stated that it was a Option 3...I was in a hurry and I simply forgot...that is ALL...honest....OH well....sigh...73 all
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00659.html (13,861 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:39:07 -0400
No problem ML. I would offer to lend you my pencil, but the eraser has been completely used up! 73, Tom - W4BQF plainly stated that it was a Option 3...I was in a hurry and I simply forgot...that is
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00662.html (15,419 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "Keyer" <telegrafiste@tiscali.fr>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:41:26 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
It really is time all this nonsense was sorted out. Omni 6+ versus Omni 6 with option 3. I bought an Omni6 with option 3 which was advertised as an Omni6+. However TenTec make no distinction and sell
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00663.html (8,663 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:54:55 -0500
Nope - Ten-Tec sells them at distinctly different prices. Example? Here's from this month's Used/Demo list: 563 Omni-VI $1195 563/OPT1 Omni-VI with user installed VI+ DSP $1270 563/OPT3 Omni-VI facto
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00664.html (9,290 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Valko - W8KC" <w8kc@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:00:20 -0400
Ten*Tec sells the Omni VI+ for $300(U.S.) more than the Omni VI option 3. The Omni VI+ can be anywhere from a couple of months to a few years newer than any Omni VI option 3. So they MIGHT have less
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00665.html (10,535 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "Keyer" <telegrafiste@tiscali.fr>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:16:15 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
Ten*Tec sells the Omni VI+ for $300(U.S.) more than the Omni VI option 3. The Omni VI+ can be anywhere from a couple of months to a few years newer than any Omni VI option 3. So they MIGHT have less
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00667.html (9,424 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "Keyer" <telegrafiste@tiscali.fr>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:37:16 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time)
I too am the happy owner of an Omni with option 3 and yes, it is a great radio. However I did believe I was buying an Omni 6+ and paid the price as it was advertised as such, please, is there a way t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00668.html (8,639 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: James Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Scott, or anyone from Ten-Tec Sales...would you please jump in and set the record straight on this? Commentary on this topic has gone on WAY too long. Thanks and 73 de Jim - AD6CW List Administrator
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00669.html (8,574 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "M. P. Haynes" <k4beh@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:50:33 -0400
CHILDREN, CHILDREN! DON'T MAKE ME STOP THIS CAR! SETTLE DOWN BACK THERE! ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00673.html (8,878 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "David Hammond" <dhhdeh@concentric.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:14:15 -0400
There were indeed evolutionary changes from an early Omni VI which I bought in 1996 and converted in 1997 to an Omni VI Opt 3 to the late Omni VI+'s. I documented these changes on this forum several
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00680.html (8,873 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "rr1632" <rr1632@dragonbbs.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:56:04 -0400
OK guys..enough said abtout my mistakes/health..etc..., OK??...Please now everyone, group hug....AAAHHH...now , doesn't that feel better...HI...God Bless Us,. Everyone....ML-- Original Message -- Fro
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00682.html (9,413 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu