Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+FS\:\s+Omni\s+VI\s+\+\.\.\.\.excellent\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "rr1632" <rr1632@dragonbbs.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 23:58:41 -0400
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00683.html (10,448 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:28:12 -0400
This is essentially correct. However, there are some differences between the two radios: 1) If I'm not mistaken, the Omni Six (and all factory upgrade versions 1-3) use a crystal oven for the refere
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00686.html (10,175 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "jerry judy" <ke8npjmj@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:38:31 -0400
Well, let me get my ywo cents worth in. Befor I bought an Omni6 with Option 3 I talked to TT about the difference between the two. I can't remember who I talked to at TT but he assured me there was n
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00687.html (9,924 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:53:00 -0500
Early VI+'s did not have TCXO, it was a later addition. My late 1997 VI+ did not have the TCXO. 73, Duane On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:28:12 -0400 "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net> writes: Duane Calvin, A
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00690.html (8,935 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] FS: Omni VI +....excellent (score: 1)
Author: "J. W. (Dub) Thornton" <dub@oklahoma.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:03:30 -0500
I bought my Omni VI, factory option 3 upgrade, used. Option 3 was done in 1998. TCXO was installed in July 2000. Dub At 08:53 AM 7/22/2004, you wrote: Early VI+'s did not have TCXO, it was a later ad
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00693.html (9,413 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu