Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+FW\:\s+Corsair\s+vs\s+Corsair\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+FW\:\s+Corsair\s+vs\s+Corsair\s+II\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:28:29 -0500; In 1974, the Dictionary of Electronics listed mf or mfd as alternate ways to express microfarads. The use of nano fareds also came in about post 1968 or so. Before, we had 0.01 mf caps, and 0.001 mf.; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00177.html (10,085 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Tim <tim@sideswiper.plus.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:35:08 +0000; Hi All, As far as I can remember micro farad was designated mmf in the days of old. Tim gm3eew Stuart Rohre K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00178.html (10,566 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:42:03 +0000; Nah, mmf was pf Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00179.html (11,170 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:30:19 -0500; No, mmf was always micro micro farad, what we today call "picofarads". (10 to the minus 12th power.) Stuart Rohre K5KVH (who used to teach electronics in a multi language school, in British Commonwea; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00180.html (9,916 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:32:28 -0400; I remember going to Martin sound to buy parts and asking for 20 puff capacitors. He knew what I wanted Mike wb8vge Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00181.html (12,042 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Tim <tim@sideswiper.plus.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:16:26 +0000; Hi All, I guess I am getting the the anno domini problem hi hi. 73 Tim gm3eew _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00183.html (9,814 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:41:28 +0000; One of the problems is that TT are not consistent in the way they label components. For example, on the 80987 board schematic all the RF blocking chokes are labelled 100mH; on all the other schematic; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00185.html (10,299 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:51:09 -0500; Steve, I doubt if TenTec had very many proof readers in 1986. Usually the design engineer has to sign off on the drawn schematic and should have caught a lot of these errors. All I think we can do is; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00186.html (10,868 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:33:12 +0000; @ Barry N1EU, Hope you don't mind me pointing out a small error in the "RF/IF Design" section of your Corsair II Wiki site. "Don't know about the Omni V and VI, but the "attenuator" switch on the Cor; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00254.html (9,405 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:31:51 +0000; Thanks for filling out K0CQ's original comments Steve, changes made! 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00255.html (10,277 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 30
Page: [1] [2]