Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Flex\s+Radio\s+for\s+Contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Flex\s+Radio\s+for\s+Contesting\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Nathan Moreschi via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:37:39 +0000 (UTC); I'm not sure about the differences in latency between the Flex 6500 and Flex 6700 (if any) but I wouldn't rule them out for serious contesting. Here's a post from K9CT during last week's ARRL 160 Con; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00160.html (20,861 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 18:43:33 +0100; Was that in SSB or CW, Nate? 73 Rick, DJ0IP --Original Message-- From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Nathan Moreschi via TenTec Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 3:38 PM T; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00172.html (21,668 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Nathan Moreschi via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 18:09:08 +0000 (UTC); CW 73 Rick, DJ0IP --Original Message-- From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Nathan Moreschi via TenTec Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 3:38 PM To: Discussion of Ten-Tec E; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00175.html (22,209 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Gary - AB9M" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:29:39 -0600; I can answer that one..... it was CW. I know Craig and also know that he is in a non-disclosure contract with FLEX so there are a lot of questions he cannot answer. He did however do a FLEX presentat; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00176.html (20,493 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:45:26 -0600; OK, I don't claim to be a "real contester" as I don't sit in a chair for 48 hours or run at 45 wpm (then again, not many contesters run at this speed either.) I enjoy CW and RTTY contesting in small; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00177.html (24,370 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:48:34 -0500; Good testimonial to what the issue is and is not Duane! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00178.html (27,004 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:49:46 -0500; I can't imagine that this wouldn't bug the heck out of K9CT but perhaps he had beta software/firmware with lower latency filtering. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00179.html (28,599 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:55:10 -0500; That's not what the latency does. You don't miss the guy coming back at all. You hear him 170 msec later, in full. Nothing gets chopped. He just thinks you are slightly slow on the trigger. Carl More; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00180.html (24,740 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:02:09 -0600; And in case I didn't lean on this enough, if the other person isn't really quick on the trigger, you'll never hear what I'm describing. Some contesters are so fast they anticipate the end of your exc; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00181.html (28,166 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:09:32 -0600; So, if that's true, what is the effect I was hearing? I hadn't related it to the latency question until this discussion started. The receive audio is running on a delay from "real time" all the time,; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00182.html (31,340 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:15:21 -0500; The slow turn around between transmit and receive would be caused by running semi-breakin with a delay of 300 msec or so before you go back to receive. This would cause you to miss the first elements; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00183.html (27,977 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:24:56 -0600; OK, but I'm running full QSK CW. And that doesn't explain the similar RTTY miss unless those were hair-trigger operators at the other end who were anticipating the "over." 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00185.html (34,680 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:25:18 -0600; Wouldn't this lengthy discussion of a competitor's radios be a lot more appropriate on the Flex reflector? Steve WA9JML Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4py.com On 12/8/2015; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00186.html (29,095 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:46:02 -0500; Well that has to be what is going on because the latency we are talking about causes signals to be delayed with no chopping off of signals. Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00189.html (30,727 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Spencer <w1gak@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:33:52 -0700; Use a boat anchor radio and your SDR, listen to WWV on both. The latency, if any, is easy to detect. Spencer W1GAK _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00200.html (6,951 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:42:40 +0100; NO, absolutely not! We are discussing the future of ten-tec and what features the radios should or should not have. Understanding SDR technology will help us define our own needs to Ten-Tec. I found; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00203.html (10,860 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Charles Strickland" <wa4oss@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:02:23 -0500; Over the last eight years I have used and still do, many SDR devices and various software packages. The latency varies widely among these. Use a boat anchor radio and your SDR, listen to WWV on both.; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00206.html (7,961 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:12:19 -0500; I invite interested parties to read the entire latency thread I started over on the Flex forum: https://community.flexradio.com/flexradio/topics/receive-latency The bottom line, as far as I can tell,; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00207.html (12,590 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 09:37:58 -0800; On Wed,12/9/2015 3:12 AM, Barry N1EU wrote: The bottom line, as far as I can tell, is that Flex engineering made a clear decision, at this point anyway, of providing only ULTRA steep (i.e., vertical); /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00213.html (11,942 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Flex Radio for Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 13:14:00 -0600; Thankfully, the Flex filters do not ring. I think Barry is right - because of their sharp shoulders, they tend to sound "hollow", however I've not found that it affects my ability to hear a signal be; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-12/msg00215.html (12,405 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]