Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Frequency\s+accuracy\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Frequency accuracy (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 20:45:31 -0400
Really? I mean really? Heck, Ive been told countless times Im off frequency. My hearing is shot so i tend to tune SSB in a bit higher pitch than normal. Ah WB8VGE, youre 27 hertz too low. Really? Yes
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00203.html (9,944 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Frequency accuracy (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Lelieveld" <va3dwi@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:26:27 -0400
Exactly. Everybody has their own preference for the audio pitch. Some like it higher and some lower. Before the days of accurate frequency read-outs nobody was too concerned about it. When I am net c
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00204.html (11,660 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Frequency accuracy (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:08:50 -0500
*Even my 50 year old Heathkit HW-12 Single Bander has a Digital Display.* *Check it out below......* *http://www.ebay.com/itm/121374336695?_trksid=p2059210.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT <
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00208.html (13,777 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Frequency accuracy (score: 1)
Author: P C A <xtraham58@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:03:55 -0400
Amen TONY, I hope to have the new beam up for Wed net. Andy, W3LI _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00209.html (12,453 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Frequency accuracy (score: 1)
Author: Tony <va3dwi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:12:12 -0400
Hi Andy, Didn't know you had antenna issues. Talk to you on Wednesday on 14.325.018 hi... hi. 73, Tony VE3DWI. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Bell network.   Original Message   From: P
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00211.html (13,100 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Frequency accuracy (score: 1)
Author: Bwana Bob <wb2vuf@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:28:58 -0400
Pretty funny, Mike, That's the curse of the digital display. Everyone operates on a frequency that ends in 0.0000. Nets are locked on frequency when we used to list the net frequency as "plus or minu
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00213.html (11,244 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Frequency accuracy (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:57:49 +0200
Spot-on, Mike! We have this saying in German, roughly translated: "people who have not problems, make up their own problems". 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) so i tend to tune SSB in a bit h
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00214.html (10,441 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu