Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Frequency\s+difference\s+in\s+dual\s+receivers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Frequency\s+difference\s+in\s+dual\s+receivers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Frequency difference in dual receivers (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:02:31 -1000; I don't have an Orion, or any other rig with dual receivers. I have had the opportunity to use an Elecraft K3 with dual receivers, both on the same frequency, using separate antennas. That setup has; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00258.html (9,570 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Frequency difference in dual receivers (score: 1): Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:10:27 +0000; I've used both my Orion and K3 extensively in stereo diversity mode. To be honest, I never even notice the frequency discrepancy in the Orion receivers. Plenty of soundclips at http://n1eu.com/orion/; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00264.html (11,362 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Frequency difference in dual receivers (score: 1): Author: "pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@qwest.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:34:51 -0700; I have talked to guys who say the O1 was closer and in fact my 565 seemed to be more like 3 hz apart - I have had two 566 O's in the shack and they were both off 5 plus fractional hz. I never worked; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00267.html (13,195 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Frequency difference in dual receivers (score: 1): Author: Dudley Hurry <jhurry@austin.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:02:00 -0600; Ken and others, Having phased locked VFOs is very handy, but the QST article on the K3 was a little miss leading, there are other radios with phased locked identical receivers, such as the Flex 5000.; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00276.html (11,686 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]