Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Fw\:\s+BPL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Fw\:\s+BPL\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Fw: BPL (score: 1): Author: "42hotrodz" <42hotrodz@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:46:26 -0500; FYI guys...Ed gave me permission to share this with you. VHF is looking better and better. 73, Rod K5BGB Hi, Rod, It is worse than that, even. BPL is permitted right now under the present FCC rules.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00475.html (8,268 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Fw: BPL (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:22:27 -0400; And at least one FCC commisioner is already on record as praising BPL as "broadband nirvana." So much for an unbiased, open mind without preconceived notions. (I know, I know, what else do you expect; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-09/msg00476.html (9,332 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]