Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ham\s+Radio\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ham\s+Radio\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 10:15:59 -0400; Alas - if only we could come out with a new rig yearly! We're still working on new equipment for Amateur Radio, just nothing yet to announce. We have a lot going on between the Orion/Orion II firmwar; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00112.html (7,994 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:10:35 -0500; Thank goodness! :-) Sure would be nice to get a little preview of coming attractions ? Thanks ... Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00113.html (7,867 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 08:58:47 -0700; Scott: That is good news that the development of v. 2 is continuing on the Orion and Orion II. I'm sure all on the list would agree that we would like to see some sort of listing on the TT website of; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00115.html (10,405 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:31:38 -0500; And don't forget: - SP performance - QSK (turnaround time) - AM receive bandwidth - SSB transmit audio bandwidth (or much better, just restore the whole transmit bandwidth scheme including SSB and A; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00116.html (8,198 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: BPCI@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:55:54 EDT; We're still working on new equipment for Amateur Radio Just to add my two cents worth, I would like to see a modern version of the Century 21--a CW version that is above and beyond anything being mad; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00118.html (6,811 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:08:55 -0400; Since we're all having fun . . . How about a new Orion III with identical phase-locked main receivers and impressive qsk? Don't need color or sweep display. 73, Barry N1EU ___________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00121.html (7,425 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:32:15 -0400; Now you're talking Barry. Leave the mic connector off-- or at most-- just enough audio circuit to use only in emergiences. Ole CW guys already sound "purty enuff" without all that EQ & stuff ! 73, Jo; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00122.html (7,767 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: ron <roncasa@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:50:53 -0400; Hey! Great idea! They can make the "return of the Century" by improving (removing) the stupid dial scheme that was archilles heel of them fine rigs. (also, add a auto tuner). Leave everything else al; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00123.html (7,437 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 13:53:20 -0400; Nah, improve the cw but don't forget to give us the great Orion v1 ssb. In fact, add a 1500hz roofing filter option to make the world's best narrowband ssb contesting rig even better! 73, Barry N1EU; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00124.html (7,880 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "John T. Fleming" <W3GQJ@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:55:22 -0400; I see we have some die hard CW folk here. I think TT would like to sell enough rigs to recoup their development costs! :-] 73, John W3GQJ -- Now you're talking Barry. Leave the mic connector off-- or; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00125.html (7,520 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:21:50 -0400; Ron: We're aware of the concerns about firmware. We discuss these items often - it was the first topic of conversation when I came in to work this morning. The only specific comment I'd make now on t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00126.html (9,886 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:22:27 -0700; Thanks much for the update...it is greatly appreciated! Ron N6AHA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00127.html (10,904 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Martin Ewing <ewing@ewing.homedns.org>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:24:26 -0400; Yeah, I was thinking about the mic connector. Why not just replace it with a Bluetooth transceiver? Probably cheaper than the normal mic circuit + ADC. Use your favorite BT headset, your cell phone,; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00128.html (8,277 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:58:11 -0500 (CDT); Well John, that is the question, isn't it? Consider: -- How much does it cost to re-engineer classic equipment for currently available components? -- What's a minimum run to break even? To make a dec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00132.html (9,404 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Joseph A. & Ruth O. Ryan" <ablee@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:14:43 -0400; Well, now....try and get this type of response from the Kenicoysu manufacturers. Thanks, Scott. That's what I like about the South... 73's Joe, KX4JR _______________________________________________ T; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00133.html (9,695 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:28:18 -0500; Well, maybe it's necessary to think outside the box a bit. While it may not be possible to phase lock the receivers, perhaps it's possible to get a bit closer through a fixed (or variable) calibrati; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00134.html (9,593 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:42:45 -0400; My software also now offers a main/sub calibration. I am finding my Orion II shows a consistent 6 hertz difference between the 2 receivers. My software now perfectly corrects this when in diversity m; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00135.html (10,582 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:56:22 -0500; One must wonder why T-T didn't do something like this in the original firmware -- and why they haven't done something about it in the interim ... Grant/NQ5T _________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00136.html (8,421 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:40:31 -0700; It should be easy since the final IF is pretty similar to a computer sound card, and those cards can be adjusted by external software as we have seen in some PSK31 programs that can 'tweak' a card wh; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00138.html (10,524 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Ham Radio (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:41:53 -0700; I may be placing an order soon! The software works with AC Log running at the same time? Ron N6AHA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lis; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00139.html (11,642 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]