Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Hercules\s+II\s+Finals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Hercules\s+II\s+Finals\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Hercules II Finals (score: 1): Author: "Harry N. Coates" <WA8HC@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:53:38 -0400; Hello to all, Has anyone here actually replaced the finals in a Hercules II ?? Or, replaced this type of transistor in any equipment.. Ten Tec seems to think that's what's wrong with mine.. Waiting t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00632.html (6,687 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Hercules II Finals (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:11:00 -0500; harry, here is the link to the herc II pixs..... http://albums.photo.epson.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=4276835&a=31902241&f= Merit @ RF parts was most helpful..... Bill At 09:53 AM 5/25/2006, you wrote: _____; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00640.html (8,199 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Hercules II Finals (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:19:58 -0500; harry, here is the link to the herc II pixs..... http://albums.photo.epson.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=4276835&a=31902241&f= Merit @ RF parts was most helpful..... Bill At 09:53 AM 5/25/2006, you wrote: _____; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00641.html (8,161 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Hercules II Finals (score: 1): Author: W6JC <W6JC@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:31:49 -0600; The Ten Tec Hercules II uses 8 MRF-458 Motorola transistors. The Hercules II worked very well with the Omni VI. Ten Tec offered an accessory cable to connect the Hercules II and the Omni VI so that t; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00566.html (6,806 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Hercules II Finals (score: 1): Author: "Phil Chambley Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:41:05 -0500; There were two different setups that I know of. Mine has MRF-454s. Some have, as W6JC reported, MRF-458s. Phil C. Sr. k4dpk _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00575.html (8,158 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Hercules II Finals (score: 1): Author: "Phil Chambley Sr." <k4dpk@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:43:18 -0500; BTW....If I ever have to change mine, they will be 2SC2879s. Phil k4dpk _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00576.html (7,918 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Hercules II Finals (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:25:17 -1000; Hi Phil, Why 2SC2879s? Price? Availability? Performance? Some combination of those considerations or some other reason? DE N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00627.html (9,001 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Hercules II Finals (score: 1): Author: "Harry Coates" <wa8hc1@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 13:52:59 -0500; Ken, The answer to your question is all the above.. The 2SC2879 is new manufacture, very available and priced right.. Easy to get a matched set.. Put my Herc back in great shape.. BTW.....Phil Chambl; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00001.html (6,682 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]