Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+INRAD\s+762\s+and\s+Orion\s+565\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+INRAD\s+762\s+and\s+Orion\s+565\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] INRAD 762 and Orion 565 (score: 1): Author: "Gerald Mullinix" <ni4f@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:18:18 -0500; Does anyone have experience with the 762 in the optional 500Hz roofing filter position in the 565? Does it perform as well as the TenTec 500Hz roofing filter? Happy New Year to all on the reflector.; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00036.html (6,668 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] INRAD 762 and Orion 565 (score: 1): Author: "Bob Cunnings" <bob.cunnings@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:15:25 -0700; The Inrad 762 would go in the 1kHz slot in the 565, where it performs very well indeed - because it doesn't suffer from the IMD degradation associated with the 500 Hz and 250 Hz filter positions (whi; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00037.html (8,008 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]