Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+INRAD\s+or\s+TT\s+Filters\s+for\s+Paragon\s+I\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+INRAD\s+or\s+TT\s+Filters\s+for\s+Paragon\s+I\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] INRAD or TT Filters for Paragon I? (score: 1): Author: Rosenberg.Eric@Orbcomm.COM (Rosenberg.Eric@Orbcomm.COM); Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 11:32:50 -0400; I have a Paragon I with all of the filters installed and am wondering if it is worth my while to replace any/all of them with the INRAD versions. It seems that the INRAD models might have a lower ins; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00118.html (7,355 bytes)
2. [TenTec] INRAD or TT Filters for Paragon I? (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 12:49:01 -0400; Eric, The differences may be noticed depending on how you use your rig. All of the INRAD filters are 8-pole crystal lattice filters (you really don't want the Collins mechanical filters). They do hav; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00120.html (9,074 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]