Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+In\s+praise\s+of\s+older\s+technology\s*$/: 128 ]

Total 128 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 07:13:37 -0500
Rick - make sure you use an ink that can be removed. The next owner may not want that, and you may get less for the amplifier when reselling it. _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00052.html (8,790 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:35:06 +0100
"Live for today!" (that's what I say) I always use permanent ink! I don't care about the next owner. Besides, the next owner will have the same requirements as me. If he has half a brain, he'll appre
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00053.html (10,619 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 07:29:17 -0800 (PST)
A narrow strip of red electrical tape works quite well.<br/><br/>73 - Eric<br/>W9WLW<a href="https://overview.mail.yahoo.com?.src=iOS"><br/><br/>Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad</a> ____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00054.html (8,970 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:05:20 -0500
So YOU'RE THAT GUY! (grin!) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00055.html (11,940 bytes)

105. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:13:41 -0500 (EST)
I always hated buying a piece of used gear that the previous owner engraved his call letters into the back panel....a little red ink....easy enough to get off.... I always use permanent ink! I don't
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00056.html (11,812 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:23:47 -0500
If an owner is not concerned about the resale value, and wants to drill holes in the 'S' meter bezel for ventilation....that is totally A.O.K!! ....Dave (grin!) "Live for today!" (that's what I say)
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00057.html (11,899 bytes)

107. [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 17:44:21 +0100
Yup, that was me... :-) Though I never engraved my call sign on the back panel, I did always write it on the bottom of every rig and even inside the box with permanent black ink - for good reason. TO
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00058.html (12,556 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:04:44 -0500 (EST)
Yeah...I even left a note for a theif enclosed..just in case he opened it up...not something I can disclose on a family friendly forum..hi hi . Yup, that was me... :-) Though I never engraved my call
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00059.html (13,057 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:25:17 -0800 (PST)
I have to mostly agree. As I was growing up, my Dad (W5JHJ, SK 2007) always treated the place we owned a bit like a rental: no holes in walls, no permanent installations of antennas, etc. I never lik
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00060.html (12,955 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:35:31 -0800 (PST)
That explains the upgraded Peter Dahl transformer you can still buy for the AL-80a. I've considered swapping my transformer out because it looks a little weary for its age and such. I fear a short co
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00061.html (9,337 bytes)

111. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 19:08:29 +0100
Eric, where can you buy this transformer? Do you have a link? The transformer in my amp is vibrating like crazy and the racket is driving me crazier. I have considered replacing it. If I do that, I m
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00062.html (10,731 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Yes, that's the one. As far as I know, I'm the only guy to ever buy one! The mod isn't trivial. You'll need to change the filter capacitor stack and build a FWB rectifier instead of using the origina
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00063.html (11,995 bytes)

113. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:30:33 -0800 (PST)
One other thing: The AL-*)A meter would only read B+ up to 3500 V. You''ll have change the meter shunt resistor. I changed mine such that the meter now read B+/2. Thus, 4 kV yields a meter reading of
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00064.html (12,808 bytes)

114. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:32:00 -0800 (PST)
I meant AL-80A, not an AL-*)A. Sheesh... Kim N5OP One other thing: The AL-*)A meter would only read B+ up to 3500 V. You''ll have change the meter shunt resistor. I changed mine such that the meter n
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00065.html (13,246 bytes)

115. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:00:16 -0500
I possibly lost my sanity, but that's another story! -- "You can't lose what you ain't never had." McKinley Morganfield A/K/A Muddy Waters -- . _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00067.html (7,559 bytes)

116. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 20:41:53 +0100
OK Kim, you convinced me. I won't use that transformer. I understand why all of that is necessary but it is much too much work for the little return of benefit in my case. We're only allowed to run 7
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00069.html (13,580 bytes)

117. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:49:45 -0500
Hi Kim -- you describe a lot of folks from that era. I feel the same as you. I paid for my home with cash. So MINE, all mine. I have no compunction about making it work for my hobby. Worse case scena
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00070.html (9,967 bytes)

118. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 20:54:42 +0100
Have you ever seen the size of hole a 50' tower makes when it falls on a roof? Susan would KILL you! ;-) 73 - Rick, DJ0IP (Nr. Frankfurt am Main) Hi Kim -- you describe a lot of folks from that era.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00071.html (10,107 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:17:09 -0800 (PST)
That makes perfect sense, Rick and I agree completely. It's a fair bit of work for, frankly, not a lot of return, even with the 750 W limit. I learned a LOT by doing it, so in that regard, I got my m
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00072.html (15,807 bytes)

120. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 22:30:31 +0100
Kim, that is interesting about the fan. I was unaware of that. I have built a few amplifiers, long ago, and always used AC fans. I was actually considering a d.c. fan this time around but you just ta
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00073.html (16,786 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu