Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+In\s+praise\s+of\s+older\s+technology\s*$/: 128 ]

Total 128 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:14:08 -0500
And maybe they were too busy fighting a war to play radio. Best regards - Bry Carling _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00306.html (15,355 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:40:37 -0500
Well said, Bob. Last summer, on a Brand X discussion forum, we discussed what is the "best" microphone and what is the best EQ setting. I suggested that, because we only use +/- 2700 Hz audio and RF
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00307.html (12,642 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:54:43 -0500
Rick, Not trying to start something.....but....The only difference between us and Franklin is frequency and power. At least those of us with verticals. John WA1JG And for those of you who can't remem
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00308.html (13,232 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: John Farler <k4avx1@windstream.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:54:00 -0500
I have mostly older gear, too. Nothing from this century....I run a section-wide cw net and it amused me when the guys would come on and tell me how many cycles I was off the net freq. when I was NCS
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00311.html (10,695 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:03:42 -0800
I suppose it would have had to have been the '30's and those were tough times. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00313.html (16,415 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:14:14 +0100
John, IMO it was the arrival of reasonably priced Xtal filters which led to hams getting interested. SSB was too complex in the beginning. Not everyone fancied tuning a phasing transmitter to generat
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00316.html (15,507 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:21:06 +0100
If Franklin used his setup to communicate over a distance with a second point, then I agree with you. But I am unaware of him ever doing that. I'm not an expert on history but I do enjoy reading old
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00318.html (14,476 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:51:05 -0500 (EST)
Being the owner of a recording studio as well as a ham for over 40 years, I can verify that cost has very little to do with frequency response and audio quality of most microphones. I have built cond
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00322.html (13,329 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bob barnes <k0wtz@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:04:27 -0800 (PST)
well i came up in the 50s hams loved am and you had to be in that era to love and understand it. then came collins with their first ssb rigs. talk about resentment because the money boys all gathered
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00323.html (18,159 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bob barnes <k0wtz@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:08:04 -0800 (PST)
hey some movie i see everyonce in awhile has a real spart station on a ship. its the most fasinating thing i have every seen. fire flying everyway and pure ac hum and crackling. i dont understand it
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00324.html (19,090 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:30:42 +0100
** "personally I think ham radio has gone as far as it needs to go." ** That statement reminds me of the following: "Everything that can be invented has been invented." --[by] Charles H. Duell, Commi
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00325.html (11,527 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:46:46 -0500
Some if us never left AM. That's why there are other rigs in my shack besides TenTec!! Best regards - Bry Carling _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00326.html (10,810 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Pete Ferrand <petef@sprynet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:51:21 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
Hey Doug: Now that you mentioned this, I'm curious. Could you share details on how you built the condensor mics? Or did you take a mic out of a cassette recorder and mount it in a case? As to the res
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00327.html (9,585 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: k6jek <k6jek@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:50:52 -0800
Never left AM -- that's Don, K4KYV's line and I suppose mine too except like many I left ham radio for decades. I use my OMNI VII as RF drive for my 300 W home brew class E now and often listen on th
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00328.html (12,186 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bob barnes <k0wtz@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:05:50 -0800 (PST)
well you have a good arguement but with the internet the game has changed. cheap cheap mode things can be coded for security reasons. dont forget the cell phone digital stuff. yes we are dinisors!!!!
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00330.html (13,279 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bob barnes <k0wtz@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:07:31 -0800 (PST)
doug i know a guy that put a mike element in a piece of pvc pipe with a lttle cotton in it. it sounded fantastic beat any 300.00 mike i ever heard. crazy huh? bob all things are possible in Christ Je
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00331.html (14,483 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bob barnes <k0wtz@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:08:42 -0800 (PST)
hi hi to that comment!! bob k0wtz all things are possible in Christ Jesus our savior Subject: Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00332.html (11,649 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: bob barnes <k0wtz@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:08:52 -0800 (PST)
hi hi to that comment!! bob k0wtz all things are possible in Christ Jesus our savior Subject: Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00333.html (11,529 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:13:45 -0500 (EST)
I believe it ! doug i know a guy that put a mike element in a piece of pvc pipe with a lttle otton in it. it sounded fantastic beat any 300.00 mike i ever heard. crazy huh? bob ll things are possible
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00336.html (14,525 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 04:09:11 -0500
Well we almost agree 100% -- the only point of departure, is that throwing more money at MY problems would go a very long way to solving them !! ;-) I really agree about the importance of good mic te
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00388.html (11,630 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu