Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+In\s+praise\s+of\s+older\s+technology\s+AM\s+transmitwithTenTecrigs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+In\s+praise\s+of\s+older\s+technology\s+AM\s+transmitwithTenTecrigs\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 03:10:54 -0500; Well... I probably am confused. I wish I knew more about these roofing filters. Sorry for the lost bandwidth. Back to school for me. -- JHR -- On 2/27/2014 6:37 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote: James,; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00440.html (11,948 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1): Author: bcarling@cfl.rr.com; Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:53:21 -0500; I need to open up my OMNI 6 Plus and have a good look at a coupe of things: 1) The filter in the N-1 position is NOT at all good. It dramatically INCREASES the QRM in a contest whether using SSB or C; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00002.html (11,036 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:29:48 +0000; Hard to comment on #1 without knowing what's in that slot. I've had some filters get marginal with age and others are fine. For #2, that's common and it's fairly easy to adjust with instructions in m; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00003.html (13,126 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 10:41:57 -0600; Depending on the filter installed, there is a jumper that changes the stage gain to make up the loss in the filter. Different filters have different amounts of insertion loss. It just could be the ju; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00004.html (13,508 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmitwithTenTecrigs (score: 1): Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 12:01:10 -0500; Many thanks Bob. I'm going to try to get this done over the weekend. Best regards - Bry Carling _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00005.html (15,247 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 25
Page: [1] [2]