Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Inrad\s+2\.8K\s+mod\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Inrad\s+2\.8K\s+mod\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Inrad 2.8K mod (score: 1): Author: "Hsu, Aaron" <aaron.hsu@unistudios.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:36:59 -0800; I know the discussion is about Inrad's SSB mod, but wasn't the Inrad 2.8KHz filter originally designed to eliminate a CW chirp with some Omni VI's? - Aaron, NN6O _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00905.html (7,125 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Inrad 2.8K mod (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:45:39 -0500; 2.8KHz Sort of... Originally, the INRAD 2.8 kHz filter for the 9 MHz I.F. slot was designed to widen the transmit passband to allow the CW carrier offset to rest sell within the filter passband and; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00908.html (7,628 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Inrad 2.8K mod (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:34:52 -1000; Hi all, I have an Omni VI, not a plus model. It only has provision for one narrow filter in the 9 MHz IF. Mine happens to have the 500 Hz option filter in that space. The standard 2.4 kHz filter in t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00915.html (7,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]