- 61. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:29:15 -0500
- This whole topic is weird. First, there must be a limit to what the Jupiter is capable of. After a few firmware bugs are snuffed out, what is there left to do? You can't keep upgrading a rig forever
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00713.html (12,014 bytes)
- 62. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Henning <paul@amtelco.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:52:07 -0600
- Yet people like N4PY still seem to lots to improve. There is still much to be learned about DSP programming and new programming techniques are and functions not realizable in hardware are happening a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00716.html (10,406 bytes)
- 63. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: John Merrill <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:22:37 -0500
- There is great potential here if only we can exploit it! But Carl's is software not firmware. N1JM -- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00718.html (8,307 bytes)
- 64. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:40:12 -0500
- That is correct. The N4PY software is the 'work-around' for poorly executed firmware. Tom - W4BQF -- Original Message -- From: "John Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00720.html (9,112 bytes)
- 65. [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe" <n9vx@myway.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:04:46 -0500 (EST)
- Three software updates I would like to have for the Jupiter/Pegasus: 1. Ability to adjust the transmit audio tone (EQ). A lot of voice/mic combos need the audio brightened on the treble end. 2. Adjus
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00724.html (8,486 bytes)
- 66. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Henning <paul@amtelco.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:57:14 -0600
- Well said Tommy, but it actually is more then that. The operator interface is an integral part of the system and as subject to updates as any other software based part of the system. For example ther
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00725.html (10,615 bytes)
- 67. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:21:15 -0800 (PST)
- Actually the N4PY software is an example of what can be done when you apply plenty of computing horsepower and don't constrain your radio user interface design to using an embedded processor. Firmwar
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00737.html (10,582 bytes)
- 68. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 07:11:22 -0800
- Maybe I'm different, but this ham wants a darn good radio for the price he pays. In Jupiter it's bangs for the bucks and in Orion its bangs. I want to be able to hear better than all others who don't
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00738.html (9,739 bytes)
- 69. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:08:45 -0500
- In my opinion, I certainly do agree with Rick. I especially agree with Rick that I would like to see Ten Tec concentrate on fixing the remaining firmware bugs BEFORE any new features are added to the
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00741.html (14,539 bytes)
- 70. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:00:31 -0500
- At 02:52 PM 1/17/05 -0600, you wrote: Yet people like N4PY still seem to lots to improve. There is still much to be learned about DSP programming and new programming techniques are and functions not
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00742.html (12,422 bytes)
- 71. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Kurt" <wa8vbx@wideopenwest.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:11:27 -0500
- I think part of the problem is that there is not a understand between firmware and software. Example is in a computer your CPU has basic firmware in it to get it up and running, doing what it is supp
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00743.html (13,701 bytes)
- 72. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:28:11 -0500
- TenTec derives extra income from doing this because of the enhanced value of the Jupiter and Pegasus from third party developers. It is difficult to know how much TenTec sales have been helped by th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00744.html (13,544 bytes)
- 73. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:17:51 +0200
- On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:00:31AM -0500, Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales wrote: Eventualy you reach a point of diminishing returns. The cost of a software update is not just the cost of the program
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00745.html (10,370 bytes)
- 74. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:28:30 -0500
- TenTec derives extra income from doing this because of the enhanced value of the Jupiter and Pegasus from third party developers. It is difficult to know how much TenTec sales have been helped by thi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00747.html (10,933 bytes)
- 75. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:41:45 -0500
- It may also be a matter of priorities. There are no bugs in the Jupitor that I know of, just guys wanting more features. However, the Orion still has little issues that need attention , and that is w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00748.html (11,783 bytes)
- 76. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:22:49 -0000
- Scott, Why not give Heil nformation so they can make an adapter for thei electrofet equipped mics on the Orion? OR TT make a boom mic like the Heil BM10? Thanks. -- Original Message -- From: "Ten-Tec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00751.html (11,530 bytes)
- 77. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:21:55 -0500
- Are you seriously suggesting that TenTec performs FCC certification with each release? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.co
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00760.html (8,483 bytes)
- 78. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:32:32 -0600
- I don't think that's the point - the firmware is a different level of code than Carl's code, and has many more limitations including those of time to develop, test, etc,. in order to get the rig to m
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00786.html (8,949 bytes)
- 79. [TenTec] Jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: "Lyle Dunlap" <lyle3dd@grics.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:49:23 -0600
- Will sell Jupiter 538 CE. Like new Total on air time approx. 4 hours. Purchased new from Ten Tec. Non Smoking environment. Orig shipping container, manuel etc. Not selling because I do not like it. P
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00418.html (6,553 bytes)
- 80. [TenTec] jupiter (score: 1)
- Author: ron <roncasa@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:42:53 -0500
- Hello TT fans: Has anyone have experience with this radio during contests?? My club uses a TS570 and we all agree it to be marginal. Main issues being desensing from nearby stations. We use it mainly
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00425.html (6,895 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu