- 1. [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: w9qp@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:16:18 +0000
- I am having quite a time trying to decide what HF rig to purchase. Need to stay in the $1200 - $1400 range because of the available cash. I have gone through the used rigs but now want to purchase ne
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00082.html (7,596 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:38:10 -0800
- John: I did own a new Jupiter with autotuner. After about four months I traded it for an Omni-VI+. For me it was a sincere trade-up. A search of this reflector on this subject will get you many comme
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00083.html (9,394 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: "HUGHESRO" <ROGERH@realtracs.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:28:18 -0600
- john, I have several hf radios, but the jupiter is the one i use the most. I also use the n4py software. I am also 90%+ cw. I have the argonaut 5 hooked in to the n4py system. Then i have 2 separate
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00086.html (9,278 bytes)
- 4. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: "WF2U" <wf2u@starband.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:20:35 -0500
- I know that for that kind of money I'd rather buy an Omni VI (Opt. 3 or Plus) with all the filters. The Omni VI receiver runs circles around the 746... Heck, even the Corsair I got after the Omni has
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00087.html (9,350 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: W5vhp@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:52:05 EST
- John I own a Pro 746. It's a neat little rig and has a lot of nice features. Does very nicely on c.w. I see that the new ones have gone up a little the past week or so. I called Burghardt about a tra
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00088.html (7,063 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: "ki3b@juno.com" <ki3b@juno.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:59:15 GMT
- I'd like to echo some of the comments made already. I'd also look for an Omni VI Option 3. I have both the Jupiter and the Omni VI Option 3 and use the Omni for CW. It does a better job (for me) on C
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00091.html (8,246 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:45:36 -0500
- Just a comment, Jerry. At least one logging program (Hyperlog) works well with the original Paragon, even providing computer control of frequency and mode in the stock version (it will read-only a Gi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00096.html (8,159 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 14:35:08 -0600
- Ten Tec transceivers historically have had the fast QSK loved by dedicated CW operators. The Omni VI probably was more sensitive than the Icom 746, thus you should not overlook a factory reconditione
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00102.html (7,876 bytes)
- 9. [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: w9qp@comcast.net
- Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:58:42 +0000
- Thank you all for the great comments on the Jupiter and the Icom-746 PRO. I really appreciated your candid comments and they certainly have been food for thought. My very best to all of you. John W9Q
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00106.html (7,781 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
- Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:47:21 -0800
- Hey John, Im replying offline as my comments are personal. I have both the Omni VI/opt and the Jupiter. Both are very nice CW rigs. I have reviewed both at eham. net and you might take a minute to re
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00108.html (8,168 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu