Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Jupiter\s+Transceiver\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: w9qp@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 01:16:18 +0000
I am having quite a time trying to decide what HF rig to purchase. Need to stay in the $1200 - $1400 range because of the available cash. I have gone through the used rigs but now want to purchase ne
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00082.html (7,596 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:38:10 -0800
John: I did own a new Jupiter with autotuner. After about four months I traded it for an Omni-VI+. For me it was a sincere trade-up. A search of this reflector on this subject will get you many comme
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00083.html (9,394 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: "HUGHESRO" <ROGERH@realtracs.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:28:18 -0600
john, I have several hf radios, but the jupiter is the one i use the most. I also use the n4py software. I am also 90%+ cw. I have the argonaut 5 hooked in to the n4py system. Then i have 2 separate
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00086.html (9,278 bytes)

4. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: "WF2U" <wf2u@starband.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:20:35 -0500
I know that for that kind of money I'd rather buy an Omni VI (Opt. 3 or Plus) with all the filters. The Omni VI receiver runs circles around the 746... Heck, even the Corsair I got after the Omni has
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00087.html (9,350 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: W5vhp@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:52:05 EST
John I own a Pro 746. It's a neat little rig and has a lot of nice features. Does very nicely on c.w. I see that the new ones have gone up a little the past week or so. I called Burghardt about a tra
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00088.html (7,063 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: "ki3b@juno.com" <ki3b@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:59:15 GMT
I'd like to echo some of the comments made already. I'd also look for an Omni VI Option 3. I have both the Jupiter and the Omni VI Option 3 and use the Omni for CW. It does a better job (for me) on C
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00091.html (8,246 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:45:36 -0500
Just a comment, Jerry. At least one logging program (Hyperlog) works well with the original Paragon, even providing computer control of frequency and mode in the stock version (it will read-only a Gi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00096.html (8,159 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 14:35:08 -0600
Ten Tec transceivers historically have had the fast QSK loved by dedicated CW operators. The Omni VI probably was more sensitive than the Icom 746, thus you should not overlook a factory reconditione
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00102.html (7,876 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: w9qp@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 00:58:42 +0000
Thank you all for the great comments on the Jupiter and the Icom-746 PRO. I really appreciated your candid comments and they certainly have been food for thought. My very best to all of you. John W9Q
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00106.html (7,781 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:47:21 -0800
Hey John, Im replying offline as my comments are personal. I have both the Omni VI/opt and the Jupiter. Both are very nice CW rigs. I have reviewed both at eham. net and you might take a minute to re
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00108.html (8,168 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu