Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Jupiter\s+vs\s+746\s+PRO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Jupiter\s+vs\s+746\s+PRO\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:59:58 +0100; " after perusing the reviews on eHam I find that many 746 Pro owners like the radio and its features" opinions of people who do (or have) owned both. Lots of people write lots of unqualified things a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00742.html (10,519 bytes)
2. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "John Clifford" <johnclif@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:52:29 -0800; Well... Sometimes there is bias (an opinion not backed up by objective fact) and sometimes there is truth. For example, just because everyone is sitting around at the local gun club complaining about; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00739.html (11,055 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@serv.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:20:46 -0800; Not only different, but unique in its implementation of various digital applications within its design. While the jury may still be out on its superiority, its a solid platform for all the traditiona; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00738.html (8,816 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:21:29 -0500; John, old I'm not sure I would agree with that statement. While I think the Omni VI is better both on Rx and Tx, the Jupiter still performs very well and for normal operation one might never apprecia; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00735.html (9,311 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:28:04 +0100; John, The advantage of the Jupiter is the ability to control it by software (e.g., N4PY), and its flexible DSP filters. The advantage of the Omni VI is its ultimate ability to pull in weak signals un; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00734.html (8,932 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:48:19 -0500; Thank you, Mark, et al: Based on what I've heard, there seems little, if anything, to be gained by moving from the OMNI VI to a Jupiter, and some advantage to keeping the old rig. 73, John, W3ULS ___; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00733.html (7,951 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:18:19 -0500; John, I have an Omni VI (option 3 upgrade) and a Pegasus. I think the Jupiter would be similar to the Pegasus. The only negative I've noticed with the Pegasus is that if there is a strong off channel; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00731.html (10,148 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 02:20:01 -0000; Good one. and on gave on radio led really Jupiter Any _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00730.html (15,659 bytes)
9. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:12:43 -0600; I bought the Jupiter because I wanted to experiment with a radio that allowed me to practice my trade (hack software). It filled the bill. Love it. And honestly, there are very very few times when th; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00727.html (9,909 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:02:29 -0800 (PST); Sorry OM. Heard that on QRP-L a few years ago You people have to admit, this sort of thing is like the Harley guy verses the Yamaha guy. It's weak, childish, foolish, and fun to watch grown men act l; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00726.html (14,742 bytes)
11. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:51:12 -0500; Has anyone used a Jupiter's receiver under strong signal conditions. The receiver folds before a 746 does.....Beyond that I could care less for a 746pro. John N1JM Your logic is sort of like the pers; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00725.html (14,647 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:47:05 -0500; Hello, Dave: Re your comment on the T-T reflector, how do your OMNI VI and the Jupiter stack up? I have an OMNI VI, which is as you know a very good all-around CW rig. Does the Jupiter add value? 73,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00724.html (8,188 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fulling" <w4njf@email.midflorida.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:43:32 -0500; Your logic is sort of like the person that cuts off both legs of a frog and screams "Jump!".When the frog can not jump,your conclusion is :"Cutting of the legs of a frog causes it to become deaf.".Tr; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00723.html (14,083 bytes)
14. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:29:02 -0800 (PST); You're right, LITTLE surprise "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net> wrote:It "appears biased" only because it's a TenTec reflector - Even though there are comparisons, most of the folks on; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00720.html (11,390 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Kurt" <wa8vbx@wideopenwest.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:28:52 -0500; Tom, I agree with you. I read the reviews and test that are done by ARRL and others, but I also read the reviews written by hams here,eham and other sites and find them more useful then the reviews b; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00719.html (10,079 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:27:42 -0800 (PST); So blindly believe that TT is the best in every instance and everyone gave it an honest shot without bias. Sure, ok My dog can talk too, trust me I know I bought him, therefore it must be so. K3ey/Cu; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00718.html (12,244 bytes)
17. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:26:56 -0600; It "appears biased" only because it's a TenTec reflector - Even though there are comparisons, most of the folks on here have chosen TenTec. Little suprise that every recommendation is TenTec. Mine wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00717.html (11,283 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:16:21 -0500; I also read all the info on this thread and what I find is this: The thread inputs come from a group of hams who, like myself, decide for themself, based on their own comparisons to other manufacture; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00716.html (11,664 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: Curt Krelic <k3ey@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:40:45 -0800 (PST); I read all the replies to this thread and what I find is this. This thread is biased, read it again with an open mind if you believe otherwise. Reminds me of a short wave info-commerical I heard once; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00715.html (9,514 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "Ken & Linda Burrough" <w8keb@1st.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:08:53 -0500; Dave wrote>>>>>as to fan, I'm yet to run digital modes, just CW, so not sure I have needed it.<<<<<< On may Jupiter and before that on the Pegasus I needed the fan for CW. I rag chew on 80 and 40 met; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00713.html (8,615 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]