Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Jupiter\s+vs\s+other\s+rigs\s+in\s+same\s+price\s+range\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Jupiter\s+vs\s+other\s+rigs\s+in\s+same\s+price\s+range\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 16:53:38 -0400; Hi, Our club is considering buying a Jupiter. I have never seen one, let alone operated one. We plan to get and show the company video on it. Other rigs under consideration are an ICOM 746PRO and a K; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00073.html (8,005 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: w7kxb@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 07:47:31 +0000; My experience with the Jupe on FD was not too good as far as receiving in a multiple transmitter enviroment. I would stay with the K2. Another solution , though not too popular, would be to have each; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00079.html (8,777 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: "j" <justo@maplenet.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 08:13:31 -0500; alone rigs charles, since tentec has the 30 trial money-back guarrantee, you could actually get one and do an A/B/C side by side comparision. may be even simulate a field day by having other club mem; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00083.html (8,334 bytes)
4. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: "EDWARD CRAWFORD" <w4wvw@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 18:55:08 +0000; I have had the Jupiter for about 2 months and thus far have not felt the need to look at the manual. It is so simple to operate it is hard to believe. The DSP NR is amazing as far as strong signals a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00088.html (10,168 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:34:55 -0500; The name of the game on Field Day is cleanliness of RF output and a bulletproof receiver. IMO, the only good choices are the newer generation Omni's, the Orion, and the Elecraft K2 family. The K2/10; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00090.html (10,853 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:55:08 -0500; One point I forgot to address. The K2 is not as easy to operate as the Omni or 746 families. The original post correctly noted, for example, that the DSP system scores very poorly for user-friendline; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00092.html (8,978 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: Charles Greene <W1CG@QSL.NET>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 19:48:59 -0400; Jim, Tnx for the input. Some comments on your comments. On CW, some of us locally who have K2/100s have difficulty in seeing any improvement in operation by using DSP on CW, other than the improved f; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00104.html (12,411 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 23:31:28 -0500; Racked I did just under 1,000 Q's on mine, in about 17 hours. At my home QTH, in the middle of Chicago, I have a moderately high noise level that the K2 Noise Blanker won't touch (the Omni V NB does); /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00105.html (9,517 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 07:27:29 -0400; K9YC: contest rig in the world. Check out the K2's close-in IMD performance at <5 kHz spacings: http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/lab/k2.pdf (page 21) http://www.sherweng.com/Dayton_2004/; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00111.html (10,560 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: Al Baker <w5iz@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 04:47:29 -0700 (PDT); OM Bill, Inrad filter is the 762? 73 de Al, W5IZ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ______; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00112.html (8,337 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Jupiter vs other rigs in same price range (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 08:03:46 -0400; W5IZ: Well it was my home brew 352 that Sherwood tested...so that's one better than a 762. ;-) Yes, I meant the 762. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00113.html (8,548 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]