Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Just\s+an\s+observation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Just\s+an\s+observation\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:55:08 -0500; Art, It could be the K3 transmitter was very clean and the OMNI 6+ was not. It doesn't always mean one receiver was better than the other. Jerry W5JH I operated from a 2F station this weekend where t; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00110.html (14,948 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 19:51:03 -0500; I like your call, Jerry! My Dad was W5JHJ, now an SK. I own and operate a TT O II. There, obligatory TT content inserted. That said, I didn't use my O II in FD this year and there were no TT rigs at; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00111.html (14,317 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:01:05 -0500; After selling an Omni VII, "settled" for a 544, a 540, and an Omni C in my home shack. Only digital mode I operate is CW. Yes, long live the 544/540. Curt, KB5JO _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00112.html (9,460 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: "Marshall Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:05:53 -0500; Come on guys, Ham Radio is supposed to be FUN. Find something you enjoy doing and DO IT. Contesting, DXing, satellite, QRP, or whatever. Me, I like DX. I'm at 333 of the current 340. So what? It's wh; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00113.html (10,089 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Haigwood" <jerry@w5jh.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:19:54 -0500; Hi Kim, I am not a good contester. However, when I find someone sending slower than me (and I have to look long and hard), I slow down and then repeat everything. Maybe I am taking too much time but; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00114.html (15,602 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:14:11 -0400; Still copying satellites, Ray? Just like your Sputnik copy in 1957.....(HI..HI..HI..HI .... .. .... .. .... .. old habits die hard.;-) Perry w8au _______________________________________________ TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00116.html (8,640 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:14:11 -0400; Still copying satellites, Ray? Just like your Sputnik copy in 1957.....(HI..HI..HI..HI .... .. .... .. .... .. old habits die hard.;-) Perry w8au _______________________________________________ TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00117.html (8,549 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:05:45 -0700; It could also be that the K3 is cleaner in TX than the Omni VI. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00123.html (10,033 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 01:12:14 -0400; With due respect, Bob... there IS a THIRD category... in which I belong: i.e., those who know they don't know what they are doing. But I AM learning... ;-) Oh... seriously ... they guys at the site d; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00125.html (10,506 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:48:03 -0400 (EDT); Perry, Yes, I made 3 CW QSOs on FO-29 at our FD site this year. BTW, Sputnik I didn't go HI HI. It sounded more like a squeak. It was OSCAR I that said HI 73 Ray W2RS ________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00128.html (8,280 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:53:43 -0500; In the words of one noted speaker and writer Will Rodgers: "It's not what people know that concerns me. It's what they know that isn't correct that gives me concerns". 73 Bob, K4TAX _________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00129.html (11,877 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:11:20 -0400; Thanks for jogging my memory... but I still remember you getting kudos in Popular Electronics mag for copying the 20 MHz sigs.... great stuff for us school kids back then. You sort of became a legend; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00136.html (8,790 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:56:59 -0400 (EDT); Tnx, Perry. I don't know about that legend stuff. Lots of hams copied Sputnik, etc. but I was one of those who got written up in the press. You're right about those being different times. The USA was; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00140.html (8,594 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: Bill Rowlett <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:18:52 +0000; I know this is a waste of time, but, FD IS NOT A CONTEST 73 Bill KC4ATU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00144.html (12,428 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation (score: 1): Author: art davis <n4uc@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:54:09 -0500; Point well taken. And a very possible explanation. It was the first time that I had ever seen such a dramatic difference in performance of two excellent receivers. But you are correct, I was ASSUMING; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00145.html (16,892 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 35
Page: [1] [2]