Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+K2\/100\,\s+Orion\s+review\s*$/: 65 ]

Total 65 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Lodahl" <lodahlkh@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 19:48:13 -0600
I wonder about all the traffic about this as well. Some folks like to debate this stuff to death. Others are just trolling. It's getting a little old for me. Sounds like the endless debates between F
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00994.html (10,339 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:15:11 -1000
Sounds like the endless debates between Ford and Chevy zelots. Maybe we'll start seeing window stickers of a cute cartoon character urinating on various radio manufacturers' logos, just like we do wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00996.html (8,862 bytes)

23. RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Lodahl" <lodahlkh@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 20:39:17 -0600
In a way we do, only here it is done with test reports and technical jargon. Same outcome. KB9NUM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00997.html (9,294 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 03:04:41 -0000
Good one. comparing _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01000.html (11,376 bytes)

25. RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 08:52:29 +0100
I do not agree with you. I don't think one setting will always be right for all speeds and all the different "fists" which people have. Not everyone uses the electronic keyer. 73 Rick Equipment manuf
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01008.html (9,250 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 03:26:41 +0000
Carl Moreschi wrote: The Orion is one awesome transceiver and clearly the best one ever made. So y'all just shut up and accept perfection. ;-) Bob, 5B4AGN, P3F Carl Moreschi N4PY Franklinton, NC -- O
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01011.html (11,028 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 05:03:09 +0000
No it isn't. That's what folks are beefing about. If you operate the ptt on CW the Orion produces uninteruptable carrier at full power. Dunno why. Bob, 5B4AGN, P3F Sinisa Hristov wrote: Is the front-
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01012.html (10,016 bytes)

28. RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Jednacz" <tjednacz@ieee.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:26:52 -0500
PTT and CW keying are the SAME thing. Ten Tec has always keyed the PTT line for CW. Set the software for NO PTT on CW then all will be OK. Tom, W7QF No it isn't. That's what folks are beefing about.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01032.html (10,618 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Rich McCabe" <r.mccabe@1967z28.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:31:02 -0600
Yea this MAY be true but it is still funny to see the little ole K2 sitting next to the mighty Orion in the results. 5" to 60" sitting side by side looks funny ! My hats off to the boys at Elecraft :
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01036.html (12,359 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 13:45:06 -0500
Low. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01037.html (9,211 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 13:47:59 -0500
If fact, both elements ARE affected. Shortening seems to be 8.8 ms (12 ms for the first dit). (Dit width measured at half amplitude). 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN ________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01038.html (9,129 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 13:53:34 -0500
I find this inferior to PTT because of extra delay. Using PTT I'm on receive immediately after the last dit ends, and all that with a non-QSK amplifier. I believe that manufacturers should limit them
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01039.html (8,724 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 13:55:23 -0500
Yes, that would be imperceptible. But, as it isn't, it ain't. The first dit is shortened by 12 ms, and rest by 8.8 ms. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01040.html (8,413 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 22:38:37 EST
have never needed this crutch to go between transmit and receive on CW. If you want semi-breakin on a tentec radio, you just adjust a delay that really just mutes the receiver a little longer so you
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01059.html (8,845 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:51:34 -1000
Yuri wrote, in part: Hmmm, strange then that Scott, W4PA was able to WIN one of the categories of the just past CQ WW CW contest; and he used TWO Orions. Bet he was not dealing with "clicks" in the h
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01061.html (9,672 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:53:36 -1000
Oops, forgot to mention that K1CC was using a version of CT here when using the Orion, but the Orion was not "linked" to CT. That program was on Rich's lap top. 73, Jim KH7M _________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01062.html (8,020 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:04:10 EST
one of the categories of the just past CQ WW CW contest; and he used TWO Orions. << I won South American WPX record as P40A on 80m with single Icom IC730, does that mean we do not need better radios?
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01063.html (8,516 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:14:56 -1000
No, what I reported means that the Orion, as is now, present rig status, was NOT a huge obstacle to recent, success. Were these issues REALLY big deals, and impediments, these fellows would not have
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01066.html (8,993 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 04:27:43 -0000
Good one. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01068.html (9,659 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 01:59:00 EST
implying that contesters could not possible do well on CW with the Orion in its' present state.<< Not at all, but they could do better by having PTT control and fine tuned timing. Saves relays, less
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01069.html (9,421 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu