Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+K2\/100\,\s+Orion\s+review\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+K2\/100\,\s+Orion\s+review\s*$/: 65 ]

Total 65 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:26:30 +0000; What satisfies one man is no measure of what will satisfy all men. If there are contesters who have a strong preference for PTT switching of their stations in CW operation, it seems rather a pity tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01074.html (12,059 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen, Esq." <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 05:48:55 -0500; better Or.... Find another radio that fits your operating style. -Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01076.html (9,142 bytes)
43. RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 12:36:36 +0100; Yuri, this post was a bit misleading. The IC-730 was an outstanding radio. It was ham-band only rig with a limited selection of outstanding crystal filters. Most Icoms that followed it were far worse; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01078.html (9,577 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 09:15:30 EST; OK, I'm confused (puzzzled). If ORION was designed for contesting AND weak DX work. THE WHY DID TT LEAVE OUT A KEY FEATURE? PTT FOR CW? I am currently interested in the DX capabilities, BUT maybe wil; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01085.html (8,525 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 11:23:56 EST; Because they are mostly "magazine" reviews. Magazines need ads to survive, they are not going to bite the hand that feeds them, other thing is the personal (expertise, sex :-) preferences of the revi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01098.html (8,592 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 11:58:10 EST; better Or.... Find another radio that fits your operating style. -Paul, W9AC That's what contesters have been doing and why TT worshipers wonder why there are not more TT radios used by contesters. N; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01103.html (8,709 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 12:08:38 EST; because I happen to believe the Orion may potentially be the best contest radio available. That is why I have spent $4500 to acquire one. I wouldn't waste words on the majority of radios in the marke; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01104.html (9,367 bytes)
48. RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 18:18:00 +0100; Yuri, sounds like you're about to open up a "Ring of Fire" ;-) Because they are mostly "magazine" reviews. Magazines need ads to survive, they are not going to bite the hand that feeds them, other th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01106.html (9,716 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 16:35:53 -0000; Hardly a key feature. LEAVE change, COMPLAINED _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01107.html (10,099 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:34:06 -0000; Totally uncalled for. educate, opportunity, shack. lifetime net _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01110.html (10,346 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 12:51:27 EST; See what I mean? :-) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01111.html (7,828 bytes)
52. RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 19:16:39 +0100; Yuri, You were absolutely "spot on" with your analogy. Thanks. No offense meant to those who don't agree. The biggest problem is, most of these guys have never operated from bunga bunga. They never p; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01113.html (10,612 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 13:48:27 -0500; Kc9cdt@aol.com wrote: OK, I'm confused (puzzzled). If ORION was designed for contesting AND weak DX work. THE WHY DID TT LEAVE OUT A KEY FEATURE? PTT FOR CW? I am currently interested in the DX capab; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01115.html (10,322 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 18:55:28 -0000; All the TenTec and ACOM amplifiers do exactly this sequencing. You hook up TxOut from the tentec transceiver to keyin of the amplifier. Then keyout form the amp back to the transceiver TxEn jack. Thi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01117.html (10,882 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: W B Reese <tentec@radions.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 11:01:44 -0800; Well, I have a Titan One (Model 425), and it does exactly that. The key plugs into the amp and the amp keys the rig. We don't have to look very far! "TR" WB6TMY At 01:48 PM 12/27/2003 -0500, you wrot; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01118.html (10,059 bytes)
56. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:08:14 -0500; Yes, I was just giving the PTT on CW guys a hard time. My external PIN switch is set up for sequencing :-) But, I've not seen a small external sequencer for use with older amps that do not handle the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01120.html (10,826 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:37:42 -0500; How about a ham who invested $3500 in Orion, and is unable to invest a similar amount in a "compatible" amplifier? On the other hand, the real cost (if any) of providing (ore rathet preserving) PTT f; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01124.html (9,490 bytes)
58. RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 20:41:29 +0100; Tongola, All Ten-Tec amps are QSK amps. Always have been. Also often had problem with the relays. Most of the Alpha amps as well as the Acom amps also have compatible keying circuitry. Also have the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01126.html (11,793 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:42:39 +0000; A fascinating idea but on the other hand.....as all cars have wheels why would you buy one without and then have to improvise through the attachment a couple of garden rollers? Bob, 5B4AGN, P3F PTT i; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01131.html (10,770 bytes)
60. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1): Author: tongaloa <tongaloa@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:57:34 -0500; Bob All amps do not handle key sequencing and some of us can build something for which a nice set of composite OZ's would be a better analogy than garden rollers. 73, -Bob ah7i Bob Henderson wrote: A; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01133.html (10,466 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]