Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Kachina\s+discontinued\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Kachina\s+discontinued\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: khopper@uchicago.edu (Ken Hopper); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 14:02:33 -0500; Hello All, Yes, it's true. I am sorry to report to you that effective 5/24/01, Kachina Communications, Inc. will discontinue production of all HF radio products, including the 505DSP and its related; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00160.html (10,176 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: RFpower@radiodan.com (Radiodan W7RF); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:14:22 -0700; Was it that Ten Tec had it all over the Kachina? Or the price difference? I never really looked into the major differences between the Pegasus and Kachina. On the surface they seemed very similar but; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00162.html (9,313 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: W7TS@Qwest.net (Ken Kinyon - W7TS); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:56:33 -0600; To me this post as I read it seems in very poor taste, insulting to both Kachina and Ten Tec. From all the ads on the bottom of your email, I assume you are a distributor of Ham equip etc. I would th; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00163.html (9,451 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 19:14:00 -0400; I think I can see his point. Now that the competition has gone away will the price of the Pegasus climb. I think probably not or it will drive us to the off shore brands more than ever. The Kachina h; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00164.html (10,633 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: W7TS@Qwest.net (Ken Kinyon - W7TS); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:29:11 -0600; Part of my point is that I don't feel that someone who apparently makes a living selling Ham Gear, etc. should be posting to the reflectors as though they were just another Ham and then appending ham; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00165.html (11,769 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: MNEWELL1@austin.rr.com (Michael Newell); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:54:07 -0500; And if this can happen to Kachina, it can happen to others. In my mind, this simply takes away one option that folks could have, and that's not a good thing. 73, Mike - WB4HUC Austin, TX http://wb4hu; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00166.html (9,035 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: W7TS@Qwest.net (Ken Kinyon - W7TS); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:35:48 -0600; Golly Gee Whiz, Now I'm really ashamed. I've only been an extra class amateur since 1969 and I spend at least 35% of my time on modes other than CW. And on top of it all I don't make my living from h; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00168.html (9,762 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: winjones@ix.netcom.com (Winston F. Jones); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 20:57:04 -0400; Although I'm 100% Ten-Tec, it's a sad day for amateur radio when any manufacturer leaves the ham radio business, especially an American manufacturer. Competition is good for the hobby, but there's ju; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00169.html (13,234 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: K2ZF@aol.com (K2ZF@aol.com); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 22:32:56 EDT; << Although I'm 100% Ten-Tec, it's a sad day for amateur radio when any manufacturer leaves the ham radio business, especially an American manufacturer. Competition is good for the hobby, but there's; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00170.html (8,944 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel); Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 23:10:04 -0400; Folks, It is called competition. If they make a product hams want, hams will buy it. Ten Tec produced a good product that competed directly with the Kachina product. The difference was that is was su; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00171.html (11,103 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: K2ZF@aol.com (K2ZF@aol.com); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 07:22:12 EDT; << Folks, It is called competition. If they make a product hams want, hams will buy it. Ten Tec produced a good product that competed directly with the Kachina product. The difference was that is was; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00172.html (8,711 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: k8do@email.msn.com (k8do); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 08:02:05 -0400; Ken, Dan has been around these reflectors a long time... He is straight up front with who he is and what he stands for... If you look at his sig, and visit his site you will see tha the does not deal; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00173.html (14,436 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: k8do@email.msn.com (k8do); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 08:08:16 -0400; Cameron, I am truly sorry to hear of the decline in the sales of Kachina's... My condolences... Cheers ... Denny To: <tentec@contesting.com> Kachina of last so have communities We available the a kep; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00174.html (12,381 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 08:26:20 -0400; Just my 2 cents worth. It is a shame to see any manufacturer, particularly a US one, pull out of the ham radio market, but it's got to be a tough market. Because it is 'amateur' radio, it has to be t; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00176.html (11,335 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: mark@microenh.com (Mark Erbaugh); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 08:30:21 -0400; I think it's already here, if you think a little outside of the box (or boxes, in this case). Several of the hams here have teamed up the Pegasus with the TT RX331 or RX340 computer controlled receiv; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00177.html (11,651 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: jsielke@pobox.com (John L. Sielke); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 08:58:28 -0400 (EDT); An interesting point, but do the manufacturers KNOW? Ten-tec discontinued their QRP line because QRP transceivers were not profitable, now the FT-817 seems to show them wrong. HOWEVER, I do not think; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00178.html (9,309 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:17:21 -0400; It's not that QRP radios were unprofitable, it is that Ten Tec started building a QRP radio that hams did not want at a price they were not willing to pay. This is really simple economics. The last Q; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00180.html (10,647 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: justo@maplenet.net (j); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:55:59 -0500; i agree. say a receiver mark's got a good point. i was considering getting a kachina a while back. however, when i read the ads. by kachina vs. the ads. by ten tec on the peg as well as reading vario; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00181.html (9,742 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: ac5ez@webtv.net (Larry); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:48:24 -0500 (CDT); It would be nice to pick up a cheap 817 someday .Would give me qrp on more than just 30m :) K1zw Larry Qcwa -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Admi; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00185.html (7,800 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Kachina discontinued (score: 1): Author: ac5ez@webtv.net (Larry); Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:50:46 -0500 (CDT); Cant complain abt the price of Hf rigs today. Bought a Jupiter for abt the same price I paid for a Knwd 10 years ago and got many more features on the Jupiter. K1zw Larry Qcwa -- FAQ on WWW: http://w; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-05/msg00186.html (7,794 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]