Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Low\-pass\s+filter\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Low\-pass\s+filter\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Low-pass filter? (score: 1): Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:57:35 -0500; Is a low-pass filter advisable or necessary with modern equipment (like my O2)? When I became active again in the mid-80s I automatically installed my old (1950s era) E. F. Johnson cylindrical LPF be; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00358.html (7,121 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Low-pass filter? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:12:15 -0800; I'd say no. I don't even own one. I run legal power from 160-10M and have never had a TVI complaint. Not even in Chicago, with neighbors 25 ft from me. Two huge changes -- except for a few low power; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00359.html (7,418 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Low-pass filter? (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:38:10 -0600; Good question John. Modern rigs have to meet a tighter level of suppression of off frequency signal in transmit than the rigs of the day when Low Pass filters were in demand to help with the TVI prob; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00001.html (7,894 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Low-pass filter? (score: 1): Author: "k0bx@arrl.net" <k0bx@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 12:57:59 -0800 (PST); I have always had a Drake TV-3000-LP filter in line at my shack. Then I got a Icom IC-756PRO-3 transceiver. It took me a few months to understand why I never heard anything on 6 meters? I knew me r; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00002.html (8,104 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Low-pass filter? (score: 1): Author: "Ken Simpson, W8EK" <W8EK@speakeasy.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:18:12 -0500; If anyone needs a Drake TV-5200 LPF, I have one available. Drake TV-5200-LP Low Pass Filter This is the more modern version of the Drake TV-1000 Low Pass Filter. This is the filter that may also be u; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00003.html (8,661 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Low-pass filter? (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:42:24 -0600; Yup the 21 MHz IFs did cause more than a little neighborhood unrest. That's not necessarily true. Temporarily most VHF stations went UHF for digital and many went back to their VHF channels, more hig; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00004.html (10,107 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Low-pass filter? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:32:48 -0800; running There are VERY FEW broadcasters still using the low VHF channels (2- 6) (most are in the great plains and Michigan). That is by choice -- those originally licensed to Ch 2-6 were given the ch; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00005.html (8,707 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]