Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+MFJ\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+MFJ\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] MFJ (score: 1): Author: jkbelt@spiritone.com (Jim and Kate Belt); Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 12:25:49 -0800; Sorry to see a number of posts that disparage MFJ products. I have a little "Clear Tone" speaker, the MFJ-969 Tuner and the indespensible SWR analyzer. Everything works beautifully. I have no complai; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00449.html (7,212 bytes)
2. [TenTec] MFJ (score: 1): Author: carl.s.hyde@lmco.com (Carl Hyde); Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:38:41 -0500; I agree, I have purchased many MFJ products over the years. I have the 969 tuner also and have used it on rainy field days and snowy winter DX ops and it always works. Also no serious ham should be w; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00508.html (8,679 bytes)
3. [TenTec] MFJ (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:16:06 -0500 (EST); MFJ is getting huge. Mirage, Ameritron, Vectronics....Who's next? TenTec? Last month MFJ had no less than 10 full page adds in QST. Wonder how much that cost? Steve Ellington N4LQ N4LQ@IGLOU.COM -- F; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00514.html (7,517 bytes)
4. [TenTec] MFJ (score: 1): Author: aslusher@erols.com (Alan Slusher); Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 14:13:55 -0500; Guess we all get a product or service that is less than perfect from time to time. After all, we're only too human, whether as individuals or as part of a company (any company). I bought a 4-position; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00524.html (9,083 bytes)
5. [TenTec] MFJ (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (rohre); Date: 25 Jan 1999 17:58:05 -0600; Some of the coax switches (those which are cast) are made for MFJ by offshore contractors. Those sometimes have problems with set screws being arcane types, and easily stripping out. But, once such a; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00525.html (7,760 bytes)
6. [TenTec] MFJ (score: 1): Author: alex.ai2q@worldnet.att.net (Alex Mendelsohn); Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:10:38 -0500; One experience I had with MFJ could only be characterized as unfair. (BTW: I have many MFJ1270 TNCs sited in packet applications at 9600 baud, and they're very reliable). In any case, I added one of; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00543.html (9,042 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]