Agreed. This never used to be this way. What happened? Had the list reply logic not changed, poor 'ole George would still be with us today. Is the list administrator listening? Please, please please.
Sorry Gents. The list administrator replied to me that "this subject is CLOSED." Tom/W4BQF Chester Alderman calderman@cox.net --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-b
There is another Ten Tec list hosted by QTH.NET. Perhaps it is time to "Vote with our feet?" Since this List Administrator seems to have no interest in the wishes of the list members. . +-++-++-++-++
My biggest gripe it that there was no warning it was going to change. John N1JM There is another Ten Tec list hosted by QTH.NET. Perhaps it is time to "Vote with our feet?" Since this List Administra
I guess it's already evident the lack of messages on this reflector since the 'Reply' policy was put into effect. There are three more TT list, one that John mentioned on QTH.net, the qrp group on Ya
Simply go to http://www.qth.net. If you click on the List of Reflectors, they are in alphabetic order. If you click on the TenTec list, it will tell you how to subscribe. It is the same type of serve
So vote already and quit wasting bandwidth talking about it. The listowner already gave his answer. Lets get back to radio and stop the hand wringing. Keith Lodahl kb9num@charter.net To: <tentec@cont
Author: mnewell1@austin.rr.com (Michael A. Newell, WB4HUC)
Date: Sun Feb 16 10:44:16 2003
Realize that the list owner of the QTH.NET Ten Tec list appears to be the same as the owner of this list. 73, Mike - WB4HUC Austin, TX listowner wringing. in To: <tentec@contesting.com>
That, I was unaware of. However, at last try, he had not messed up the Reply" function there. John W2AGN --Original Message-- Realize that the list owner of the QTH.NET Ten Tec list appears to be the
Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
Date: Sun Feb 16 11:26:35 2003
The list administrator had no warning it was going to change. There was a glitch at the server that reloaded the mail program with different parameters. The list administrator hasn't been happy with
In that case, a simple note explaining the situation would have perhaps directed the complaints at the server and NOT the administrator! 73, Frank, K4VMO -- Original Message -- From: "Dr. Gerald N. J
If a "glitch at the server" caused the change, it would seem that once he learned what happened the list administrator could have (should have) made that known and effectively stopped the critism. Ri
I find that curious. The List Manager was advised of the situation, and rather than responding about the glitch, posted a rather nasty response that the "matter was closed." It could be that he does