Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Merger\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:57:44 -0500
Wow....didn't see that coming. RF Concepts (Alpha) and Ten-Tec. No telling what the future holds... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00163.html (6,976 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Don Rasmussen via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 12:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
First thing RFC/TT should do is move service to some place where it is not unfairly taxed.  _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00200.html (7,230 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:02:43 -0500
*Most States have Sales Tax. How is paying the sales tax in Tennessee any more Unfair, than paying Sales Tax in your home state? This will be a moot point soon, as the politicians learn how to Tax us
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00208.html (8,137 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:30:57 -0500
And maybe you can explain that further..... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00215.html (7,926 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Robert <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:35:40 -0500
I think all tax is unfair. 73 Bob K4TAX Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tent
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00216.html (8,519 bytes)

6. [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Don Rasmussen via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
I live in California, I don't like paying tax on labor performed in Tennessee. I do like K4TAX Bob, a good ham indeed. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00220.html (8,254 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Arthur Isaenko <arthur.isaenko@adaptive-clinical.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 15:55:20 -0400
Delaware? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00222.html (8,328 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: wo8l--- via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:47:26 -0400 (EDT)
Amen, bro. It's very taxing to me. Rick WO8L --Original Message-- From: Robert <rmcgraw@blomand.net> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 7:36 pm Subjec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00223.html (9,568 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:37:25 -0500
With today's rules you would most likely pay that tax no matter where they were based. Slowly we are being forced to pay state taxes on anything we buy through the internet. One way of trying to leve
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00225.html (9,043 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Robert <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 20:14:40 -0500
When I was with SONY any service work was taxed on the city, county, & state where the labor & parts were used. If we did depot work & shipped the repaired item, tax was applied based on address of r
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00228.html (9,983 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:31:10 -0400
Even the K4 Tax, Bob? Best regards - Bry Carling, AF4K _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00253.html (10,025 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:41:52 -0400
Bry, When I first saw Bob's post and his call sign - I did wonder if he worked for the IRS and was proud enough to display it in his call sign. :-) Eric W9WLW -- Sent from my Android device with K-9
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00254.html (10,445 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Robert <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:09:34 -0500
Licensed in 1959 as KN4TAX, upgraded and proud of my ham heritage. Professionally, a retired electronics engineer. 73 Bob, k4TAX Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00255.html (11,929 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:39:13 -0700
Seriously, how many hams do you think he saw who were of the age demographic to be on Facebook or Twitter? I hadn't noticed a lot of young people in the crowd when we were there last year. I'm on Fac
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00511.html (9,756 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 16:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
I believe one of their strategies is to continue to appeal to the Maker movement... hence the Rebel and now the Patriot.  John Henry has said (via one of the TT reflectors) that they've generated a h
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00512.html (14,178 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: geoffrey mendelson <geoffreymendelson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 02:56:59 +0300
Highest margin per unit = Hacker/Maker/Kit e.g., Rebel, Patriot, etc. (caveat, to do this they'll have to upgrade their way of socializing the community development effort) <Why the Sales Manager men
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00513.html (10,802 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:41:38 -0500
I for one believe that a $500 to $1000 dollar radio packed with reasonable features and functions and with a accessories would kill the market. Money is to be made on quantity/volume production. Plus
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00515.html (13,077 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: GARY HUBER <glhuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:56:02 -0500
And I believe the kill spot for a contest / dx transceiver is $3k.... but it needs to be good and not just a dressed up $1k starter unit. 73 & DX, Gary - AB9M --Original Message-- From: Bob McGraw -
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00518.html (13,274 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 20:05:10 -0500
I agree...I'd buy that. That said I would also like to see Ten-Tec do a blow out flagship to showcase the best they are capable of. It would be a low volume unit but would be competitive with the Ico
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00520.html (14,981 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 01:21:31 +0000
I enjoy perusing the Sherwood receiver stats. What about either of the Orions was not compatible with the likes of the IC-7800 or TS-990 at a great deal less money? Even the FT-5000's receiver is onl
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00521.html (9,952 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu