Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Mics\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: vsantis@javanet.com (Vincent A. Santis)
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 20:12:32 -0500
Hello, I'm new to this list and have a question. I just set-up my Omni VI+ using the Model 705 Mic. In the past I used a Heil boom mic which I found better than a desk mic since I am vision impaired
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00151.html (6,915 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Lanning" <blanning@acadia.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:40:42 -0500
With all this talk about microphones, Does anyone know of a simple method to determine the frequency of a mic.? I have no idea how my mic sounds at the other end as I suspect that most of us don't ei
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00135.html (6,978 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:47:48 +0000
Why don't you make a recording from a second rx while you xmit into a dummy load or ask someone in qso to record you and send it to you? Seems obvious. 73, Barry N1EU ________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00136.html (6,937 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 08:08:59 -0800 (PST)
I know you weren't looking to spend money. Products like the W3IHY or Romac equalizer and noise gate allow you to monitor your transmit audio and shape it accordingly. I think the Orion II allows you
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00137.html (7,349 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: JT Croteau <jt.w6fo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:54:09 -0500
Depending on which rig you have, you may already have the equipment. On my Paragon, I have an SSB Monitor Level control which allows me to monitor SSB transmit audio through the audio amplifier stage
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00140.html (7,430 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Lanning" <blanning@acadia.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:03:05 -0500
Thanks JT. I have the Paragon and I was unaware of this feature. I will try it. Bruce W1GBS -- Original Message -- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00148.html (8,377 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 22:12:48 +0000
the only sure fire way to figure out what a mic/rig is doing on-air is to buy or borrow a decent rx (rx bandwidth = to ur tx bandwidth and flat freq. response) put on cans and listen to yourself whil
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00156.html (8,665 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:42:09 +0000
You can judge your audio much better if you're not talking while you're listening. That's why it should be recorded either by you or by another station and then played back. 73, Barry N1EU __________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00160.html (8,066 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:53:14 EST
Remember folks , we are SUPPOSED to sound like ducks on SSB, if we want fidelity, use FM.. My thought is a good , easy to listen to signal, that is intelligible beats the heck out of an over modulate
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00161.html (8,392 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:09:00 -0600
While most of the suggestions regarding determining mike quality and such see reasonable, I would point out that "listening to ones self via phones" is not a very accurate way to make a judgment. Why
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00163.html (9,220 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:14:59 -0600
Actually, SSB is a narrow band communication mode and never was intended to "sound good". Hence the existence of good sounding AM remains. Regardless of it being deemed by some to be an outdated mode
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00164.html (10,570 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 17:34:23 -0600
Have a friend across town (or the country) record it for you and send you the tape or .mp3 file. I had a local friend do that, and (1) it helped a lot, and (2) the Studio 1 on the Orion sounds outsta
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00165.html (8,967 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 17:53:09 -0600
The Studio One is a dynamic mike. A known characteristic of all dynamic mikes is "proximity effect" where the low frequency is enhanced as one speaks close to the mike. This is normal and should be w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00166.html (9,261 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Mike Gorniak <mgorniak@genesiswireless.us>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 00:12:53 -0600
Bob's analysis and advice are good. Here are a couple of extra notes: Choosing the "second receiver" method let's you hear things in the same general audio arena in which you hear other stations. You
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00174.html (9,551 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:38:54 -0600
Good points. Thanks Mike. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00200.html (10,743 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Philip Leonard WV&Oslash;T <leolists@seidkr.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:29:59 -0600
Proximity effect happens with all non omni-directional mics, doesn't matter if they are dynamic or condenser. Philip _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00232.html (8,657 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu