Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+More\s+Omni\s+VI\s+alignment\/functioning\s+questions\.\.\.\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] More Omni VI alignment/functioning questions... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 21:59:30 -0800
Thanks to those who contacted me off-list... the information was very helpful. I have learned (from Ten-Tec) that the 9.0033 Mhz crystal and padding capacitor WAS factory installed and was a factory
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00257.html (11,279 bytes)

2. [TenTec] More Omni VI alignment/functioning questions... (score: 1)
Author: DK2GZ@aol.com (DK2GZ@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:23:58 EST
Hello from Germany, I am using also an OMNI 6+. My 6+ is about +200 HZ off frequency. I have aligned CW,USB,SSB like in the manual: CW 9.000400 LSB 9.000000 USB 9.003000 Are these the correct setting
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00258.html (7,172 bytes)

3. [TenTec] More Omni VI alignment/functioning questions... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:51:55 -0800
Yes, but you must use the correct trimmer caps. The proper Omni VI BFO alignment (TX Audio Board #81597 Rev. F and earlier) is as follows: - You will need an ACCURATE high-resolution frequency counte
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00259.html (10,736 bytes)

4. [TenTec] More Omni VI alignment/functioning questions... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:09:00 -0800
Well, I've gotten LSB and USB aligned. CW is proving to be a bear. The original padding cap had a value of 56pF. That allowed me to get the freq down to 9.001900 Hz (needs to be 9.000400 Hz). I added
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00260.html (8,736 bytes)

5. [TenTec] More Omni VI alignment/functioning questions... (score: 1)
Author: johnclif@ix.netcom.com (John Clifford)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:56:10 -0800
I found the problem. Turns out that there is a capacitance spec to the BFO crystals. The original order that Dave Hammond placed was for 32pF crystals, however ICM suggested that perhaps these have a
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00295.html (8,222 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu