Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+My\s+own\s+little\s+\"quiet\s+test\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+My\s+own\s+little\s+\"quiet\s+test\"\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] My own little "quiet test" (score: 1): Author: cyr999@extremezone.com (Tim and Nancy Logan); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 22:40:04 -0700; Hi folks - earlier George wrote the two paragraphs below. When using my K2 or 756 PRO I rarely if ever have the RF gain anywhere but on "full". When I had my Omni I used it quite a bit. Anyway, when; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00111.html (9,771 bytes)
2. [TenTec] My own little "quiet test" (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 23:54:30 -0600; One should compare a terminated RF stage to the antenna, not an open antenna connector. In many RF stages, especially those critically matched for best noise figure, changing the source impedance cha; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00112.html (7,872 bytes)
3. [TenTec] My own little "quiet test" (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:24:02 -0600; Thanks for the quotes, Tim. Just the added thought that the filters, both IF and audio, on the K2 are not all that sharp compared to the PRO DSP filters. Also, the K2 has quite a noticeable roll-off; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00114.html (10,534 bytes)
4. [TenTec] My own little "quiet test" (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 05:36:21 -0800 (PST); Interesting observation and I'm wondering if that really explains what Tim was describing about the percussive characteristics of the received cw. I also notice that an FT-1000MP's received cw sounds; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00118.html (8,009 bytes)
5. [TenTec] My own little "quiet test" (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com); Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 13:01:32 -0500; I thought the percussive cw response was due to the steep sided filter shape in the default filter menu and required some adjusting. Then this was addressed in the Pro 2 and a soft/hard menu position; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00121.html (9,100 bytes)
6. [TenTec] My own little "quiet test" (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 20:28:47 -0600; I believe that certain factors such a slew rate or more importantly slew rate limited audio paths do more to impact CW than most give credit for. Just an old audio phile 's opinion. 73 Bob K4TAX; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00136.html (9,137 bytes)
7. [TenTec] My own little "quiet test" (score: 1): Author: cyr999@extremezone.com (cyr999@extremezone.com); Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 11:03:16 -0700 (MST); A similar adjustment can be made on the 756 PRO by setting a filter to an SSB default. Then SFT will show on the screed. Then use the PBT to narrow it down to your cw width. Bingo......hard and soft; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00154.html (10,136 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]