Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+NR\s+\-\s+Fact\s+or\s+Fiction\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+NR\s+\-\s+Fact\s+or\s+Fiction\?\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 15:34:52 -0500; Buck I cannot argue with you. Unfortunately it may be the case that it is never completely "right". That said, the other benefits of Orion far outweigh most of the firmware issues for my operating. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00083.html (9,052 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:30:21 EST; Orion II for two weeks now....HAd Original Orion for over a year, so I am an experienced O operator. Used it in contests and weak sig DX. 1) Hey guys... THE NR IS BROKE! Why do I say that. I had Orio; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00086.html (8,737 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:01:19 -0500; HI LEE NR FER ME MUCH BETTER! I ONLY OPERATE SSB; AND ALL OR NOTHING DIDN'T WORK FER ME! I SIMPLY DIDN'T USE IT! FORWARD TO THE FUTURE FER ME! 2.055 ALL THE WAY! LEE I'D BE INTERESTED TO SEE IF U USE; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00089.html (10,814 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:07:54 -0600; It's one of those things I was referring to in an earlier post. Some will love it, some won't care, some will hate it. The first and last groups will forever argue about why it's great or why it's n; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00091.html (9,872 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:14:41 EST; I am not sure I agree with you about the NR function but you obviously now more than I do about the technical aspects. Here is what I hear: In 1.371, the NR sounds like a squelch. The radio gets very; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00092.html (8,924 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: K4IA@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:22:17 EST; I've found that if I can't copy the signal without NR, I can't copy it with NR -- Just last night I was working a guy who I could not copy with the NR off. I tried adjusting the RF gain (which doesn'; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00093.html (8,044 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:39:04 -0600; Obviously the former, if I can get it. I liked the 1.371 variant of NR better than the embodiment in the II in many respects. The downside, as I stated in my post, is the fact that the old version s; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00096.html (8,496 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:58:39 -0800 (PST); lee Try Turning your mike gain down to 15 or 20 ,SP 3 or 4 and .your audio will be fine. The Monitored audio will sound distorted if you run run The Mon AUDIO to high. I was trying to use the mike se; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00100.html (8,409 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Shock" <douglas.shock@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:01:41 -0700; John, what do you have your Mic gain set at with the pr40? Doug / K0ZU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00101.html (9,142 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:05:37 -0800 (PST); Doug I run my mike gain on the Orion Doug I have my set my mike gain at 15 to 20 on my Orion II using the PR40 73 John WB4QDA __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired o; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00109.html (10,557 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:16:09 -0800 (PST); Doug Sorry for the messup. I run my mike gain on the Orion at 15 to 20 usung my PR40. my PR40. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the bes; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00111.html (12,463 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:11:10 -0500; Bill I also agree with you about NR. 2.055. Best by far I've seen fer SSB. All or nothing never fer me since I only operate SSB. But when i tried NR on CW 1.371 was very effective. Kewood has NR1 FER; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00112.html (12,388 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: Ralph Matheny <mathenyr@marietta.edu>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:36:15 -0500 (EST); My two cents worth.....best described ny my Orion experience. When the Radio first came...I hit the NR button and was VERY impressed with what it could do. In a couple weeks...after I learned how to; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00116.html (9,353 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:00:34 -0800; Remember that the mic setting is only relative since there is a "master level control" pot accessed through a hole on the underside of the rig near the mic connector. Changing that will cause you to; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00119.html (14,736 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:22:06 EST; Buck, Here Here I totally agree! Make the NT like it was in 1.371. I actually helped me copy signals sometimes and it sure did quiet down the noise in general. After all it's called 'Noise reduction'; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00120.html (9,047 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:29:53 EST; John, Thanks for the sugestions. My complaint about the bad audio reports were from the QSO, not the mon. I haven't tried the Mom yet. Also, I am using a Heil Pro-Line with the narrow element HC-5 I; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00121.html (8,724 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: "Chortek, Robert L" <robert.chortek@berliner.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:30:28 -0800; Mine does and the manual says it should... Bob/AA6VB Also, Anyone.... My ALC never blinks on SSB TX??? I think it should. 73, Lee, KC9CDT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00122.html (8,848 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:34:25 EST; What's a PR40? Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00123.html (8,154 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:35:58 EST; What's a PR40? a very expensive mic fro Bob Heil.. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00124.html (8,161 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] NR - Fact or Fiction? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:39:39 EST; I am using the Heil Goldline with HC5. I got super reports with it on Orion, but not on OII 73, Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00125.html (7,772 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]