Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+60\s+mtr\s+band\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+60\s+mtr\s+band\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com (KD7EFQ@aol.com); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 19:47:42 EDT; As many of you are aware, the rumor is we are supposed to be getting a new band, 60 mtrs ( 5.25-5.4mhz). We also know that the latest and greatest new rig, the ORION is becoming available. However, u; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00273.html (8,264 bytes)
2. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 19:58:35 EDT; Todd, I don't blame TenTec for not offering a mod for the 60 Meter band. It wouldn't be a difficult conversion, it would be an almost impossible one. In order to do a halfway decent job and preserve; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00274.html (8,052 bytes)
3. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: hjohnc@core.com (John Huffman); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:07:02 -0400; It True. But, an outboard transverter? 73 de K8HJ John; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00276.html (7,710 bytes)
4. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 19:11:38 -0500; Todd, it seems to me that you have brushed up against the negative side of a radio made for the ham bands only. When "the ham bands" change, and the radio can't, then you are in trouble. I think - I; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00277.html (10,824 bytes)
5. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: n4py@earthlink.net (Carl Moreschi); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:13:40 -0000; I think someone needs to do a nice transverter to convert one of the ham bands to the new 60 meter band. This would solve the problem for any radio that does not have that band. I think one could tak; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00278.html (9,798 bytes)
6. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:38:26 -0400; Wait a minute... Ten Tec is being given a "black eye" for product support for not, at this time, offering a mod for an older radio to retrofit it for a band which we MAY get in a few months or years; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00284.html (9,734 bytes)
7. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: AC5E@aol.com (AC5E@aol.com); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:00:11 EDT; An outboard transverter would work - but that's another box and another expense. Plus more to remember. I have enough trouble with remembering the 238 settings after midnight. 73 Pete Allen; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00285.html (7,595 bytes)
8. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: k4aal@jackatak.theporch.com (Ariel M. Elam); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:56:53 -0500; Hi Ron -- No, SOME others of us are not holding any of the manufacturers to any standard other than other than the published specs. I believe that 60 mHz is not included in any of these specs. Althou; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00297.html (11,375 bytes)
9. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:41:25 -0400; That's not correct - that is a misinterpretation of what we have been saying regarding the possibility of a new allocation at 60 meters and our older transceivers being adapted to use there. "We have; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00303.html (9,968 bytes)
10. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: talbot@kmr.ll.mit.edu (Talbot, George A.); Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:07:21 +1200; Dear Ten Techies, My Paragon model 585 (with the Mars mod) will transmit on the new 60 Meter band. Wonder if that will increase its resale value? <grin> Regards, George V73GT; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00314.html (7,571 bytes)
11. [TenTec] New 60 mtr band (score: 1): Author: pcuellar@bright.net (Phil & Patti); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:22:33 -0400; OH NO...Now the issue is getting confused with logic and facts. Now what are we gonna do? :) 73 de KI8JQ - Phil -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/mixed text/plain (text body --; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-07/msg00316.html (8,406 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]