Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+7800\s+reveiw\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+7800\s+reveiw\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] New 7800 reveiw (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:34:43 -0800; I just glanced over the new ARRL review of the IC-7800 to compare it to the Orion II. Although they have improved on the 5 kHz blocking numbers, the 'up-conversion' scheme results in very little impr; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00388.html (8,148 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] New 7800 reveiw (score: 1): Author: RaySoifer@cs.com; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:47:19 EST; operators, rather than CW, and more casual operators (with money, of course) rather than dyed-in-the wool CW DXers (like me) or contesters. The other day, I overheard a QSO on 20m SSB in which one of; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00389.html (8,841 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]