Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+Eagle\s+vs\.\s+Used\s+Omni\s+VII\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: kf6e@mail.com
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:28:32 -0500
Fellow Ten Tec admirers, I'm torn between a new Eagle and a used Omni VII. I do mostly casual operating, get on contests only to make contacts (never to compete), operate 160 to 6, do mostly CW and P
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00464.html (8,022 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:37:58 +0000
I think I would be torn between a new Eagle and a used Orion. And that would take the dynamic range issue right out of the picture. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenT
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00465.html (8,516 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:59:35 -0600 (CST)
Frank, I must admit to being a little envious right now. I had been saving up for an Omni VII, but a furnace repair last night (a neccesity in Pittsburgh at this time of the year!) just ate up most o
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00466.html (8,899 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:01:19 -0600
Hello Frank, I bought an Omni VII when they were first offered, and have actually contemplated selling it to try out an Eagle. Doesn't appear that the Omni VII has any features for a casual operator
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00467.html (8,191 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:49:24 +0000 (UTC)
Tough decision, Frank, I have a used Omni VII on the way. It won because: 1) I gotta have the remote tuning pad. I've got them on my Omni VI+'s and love them. With keypad and 3 function keys, it's a
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00469.html (10,167 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: John Sheeley <wb4qda@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:57:02 -0800 (PST)
The only reason I don't trade my Omni VII is because of its ability to run renote base . Any radio can be made to run remote base but it is a lot more trouble to set up . And the O7 has 3 emty  slots
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00470.html (9,470 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: art davis <n4uc@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:43:42 -0600
FYI, there is a key input on the back panel as well as the front. The PTT connection in the ACC1 jack serves as a keying input when in the CW mode. _______________________________________________ Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00471.html (12,101 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:01:44 +0000 (UTC)
Yes, but that is for either a straight key or a keyer output. I want to use the internal keyer and that is not supported on the rear. Thanks, however, for the time and attention to my issue. That is
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00472.html (13,256 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:02:41 -0500
You CAN plug your key into the back of the Omni VII as well as on the front. == K8JHR == why does the Omni VII have it on the front, and a 1/4" monster at that. == ___________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00486.html (8,559 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:03:39 -0500
I did not see this answer when I posted my comment... == JHR == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00487.html (8,391 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:39:02 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Hey guys. We're hams! How difficult is it to disconnect the cable from the rear plug and run the cable from the front plug back to the rear? Then, when you sell or trade the rig put it back as it was
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00488.html (8,313 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:43:53 -0500
How would YOU terminate the cable at the rear of the rig? Would you drill a hole for a jack or just run the cable outside the rig and terminate with an "in-line" plug? Or some other plan I have not t
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00490.html (8,103 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: "N4PY" <n4py2@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:54:05 -0500
I would just use the key line on the accesory cable. If my memory is correct, this is the black female RCA jack omn the acessory cable. This key line is great for straight keys and external keyers si
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00492.html (9,098 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:46:35 +0000 (UTC)
Once again, the point is missed. There is a lead on the accessory jack if I wanted to just use a straight key or an external keyer. We covered that earlier. Let me try this again: I WOULD LIKE TO USE
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00495.html (10,955 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:19:16 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Good solution, Carl. I don't own an Eagle nor have I read the manual, so my suggestion to unsolder and change key cables was just out of "ham creativity". Scott K4VWK --Original Message-- ___________
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00499.html (10,450 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Ray Sills <raysills@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:59:42 -0500
Hi Gang: In looking at the photos of the Eagle on Ten-Tec's site... I -onlysaw a key jack on the rear of the radio... nothing on the front. Did I miss the point? The only jacks I see on the front are
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00500.html (10,129 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:24:53 +0000 (UTC)
No, you didn't miss a thing. My original point was that: 1) My Omni VI+'s have a 1/8" jack on the rear panel that supports the internal keyer with the paddle of your choice 2) The Eagle has a 1/8" ja
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00501.html (12,344 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] New Eagle vs. Used Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:08:38 -0500
if I had a wish for the Omni VII that is different than built, it would be We all have such wishes... mine would be for a second receiver, and for the audio monitor to get fixed (i.e. to listen to fi
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-12/msg00510.html (9,405 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu