Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+and\s+Improved\s+Terminology\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+and\s+Improved\s+Terminology\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 18:43:47 +0000; Rick, I'm right in the middle - about 100 miles from the sea in any direction. For that to work I guess I'm going to have to try the ELF bands ;) 73, Steve G3TXQ _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00166.html (12,721 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (score: 1): Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 06:50:12 -0500; Steve, Do you know if the elevation chart would change much if instead of a ground-mounted 80m quarter-wave vertical, a half-wave vertical dipole was used ? The maximum current point would rise a qu; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00191.html (13,264 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (score: 1): Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 13:24:10 +0000; Paul, I tried an 80m vertical dipole with its tip just 1ft above ground. Of course the TO angles are generally lower than the quarter-wave because of the increased vertical dimension. The results pre; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00196.html (11,670 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]