Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+New\s+and\s+Improved\s+Terminology\s+\(NVIS\s+origins\)\s*$/: 96 ]

Total 96 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:03:08 -0500
I agree Carl, but you do need the horizontal room, which I often did not have in many of my locations. That's why I kept coming back to the vertical dipole. In the meantime I have begin using somethi
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00136.html (17,348 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Jack Mandelman <modelman@ieee.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:37:09 -0500
And, as the base of the ground plane vertical is further elevated above ground a smaller portion of the near field fringes through the ground, and the efficiency increases. In the infinite height lim
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00138.html (8,632 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:48:28 -0500
Actually Jack, you can achieve a near perfect azimuthal radiation pattern with just one single radial. The trick is to run it in one direction for about 1/3 of its length, bend it 180 degrees and bac
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00140.html (10,747 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 16:16:18 -0500
James, that is a tough call because it is not really apples to apples. A specific answer to your question, as compared to "my" vertical dipole, then I must say I believe the raised quarter wave verti
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00141.html (14,624 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:46:42 -0600
I think you could read Gordo's comments as intending to say there is more efficiency, and hence more signal power radiated at the optimum (low angle for a vertical), if you have a good near field gro
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00142.html (12,591 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:53:14 -0600
Severns, Cebik, and others have shown that even with elevated radials, it is hard to get equal currents in each radial, due to interaction with the type of ground below the radial. While the elevated
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00143.html (11,119 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:10:12 -0600
Gordo, is Gordon West of the Gordon West radio School study disks series, and long time instructor of new hams on the west coast of USA. -Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00144.html (10,751 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:12:02 -0600
Probably in the real world about 2.8 dB. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00145.html (16,145 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@tbc.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:33:42 -0600
I have found this discussion most interesting. Due to the geography of my house and lot, I am largely confined to vertical antennas on HF. I do have a tower for 6 and 2 meters, which work very well f
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00146.html (13,414 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:34:17 +0000
Stuart, That seems a very "generous" interpretation of what Gordo is quoted as saying: "What strongly affects the shape of the far-field low angle which we want? the low angle elevation pattern of a
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00148.html (11,699 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:27:00 -0500
OK, Rick, I get all that. It -IS - a difficult choice and not as clear cut as one might, at first blush, think. As I mentioned in another post, I am contemplating making either a 20 m vertical dipole
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00152.html (13,861 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Nathan moreschi <n4ydu@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 06:03:30 -0800 (PST)
I've not had a lot of success with vertical dipoles and limited success with 1/4 verticals on 40M. However, they both have their place. I think it is important to remember what the desired results fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00154.html (15,793 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Rsoifer@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 09:20:19 -0500 (EST)
Nate, My experiences lead me to go even farther. I have an elevated (10 feet above ground) Hy--Gain AV-640, which is a 3/8-wave multi-band vertical with top hats and four 6-foot counterpoise rods. My
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00156.html (15,317 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:04:58 -0500
James, I understand your concerns and it sounds like the aluminum is under-dimensioned. I also understand the wish to use what you have, but that might actually be a bad idea, depending on what you w
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00162.html (16,632 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 13:28:59 -0500
Very good practical analogy Nate. Bottom line, you need two antennas (per band); one for DX and one for NVIS. Actually, for 20m and above you only need a DX antenna. On the 70' high horizontal dipole
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00163.html (17,657 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Jack Mandelman <modelman@ieee.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:38:07 -0500
Rick (NJ0IP / DJ0IP), How did you deal with bringing the feedline away perpendicular to the vertical dipole? I have many tall trees, but routing a high feedline perpendicular to the VD is quite a cha
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00167.html (8,332 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:08:36 -0500
Jack, My feedpoint was at about 35' (the base of the pole was elevated about 5'). I had a fairly large yard and the antenna was about 50 or 60 ft. from the house. What I did was hook a small Kevlar r
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00170.html (11,127 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:43:08 -0500
WHOA... RICK... You understand my position exactly. -- Exactly. Darn it... At least the 6 and 10 meter versions turned out well. It is just that the 20 meter version is, as you say, under-dimensioned
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00184.html (15,035 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:33:15 -0600
You can solve your willowy tubing with stay wire braces, probably want to use a poly rope instead of wire. Stay wire braces have been used on slim masts, elevator legs (for grain transfer at an angle
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00188.html (18,003 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins) (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 18:30:22 -0500
Can you provide a link or reference to that Mfr in Sweden ? Thanks. == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00216.html (8,412 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu