Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Next\s+filter\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Next\s+filter\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: wa2yjf@optonline.net (Tom Provost); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:42:17 -0500; My Omni 6+ has the 1.8 kHz and the 500 Hz cw filters in the rig now.What would be the best bet for the next cw filter,250 Hz or one of the narrow 1-2 filters? I plan on filling the filter slots one b; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00033.html (7,545 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: w4au@contesting.com (John Unger); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:23:41 -0500; My vote is for a 500Hz filter in a filter narrow slot; stacking the two 500HZ filters gives you awesome freedom for interference by nearby strong signals. I find that combination much more useful tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00035.html (8,248 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:37:13 -1000; 500HZ filters gives you awesome freedom for interference by nearby strong signals. I find that combination much more useful than a 250Hz filter. Of course, YMMV... For a bit higher price, I would ad; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00038.html (8,044 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: jtgwin@home.com (John Gwin); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:43:25 -0600; Ditto. -W4SK; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00039.html (8,102 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A Calvin); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:43:30 -0600; If you are a CW contester or DXer, I recommend the 250 Hz filter. It is simply amazing. It somehow seems to reduce noise more than it does signal levels, and I find it very useful. Just my opinion. O; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00042.html (8,942 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Mike Hyder); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:57:00 -0500; Ditto to what? Mike N4NT; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00043.html (8,416 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: ke5c@hot.rr.com (John, ke5c); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:02:13 -0600; now.What narrow but, Unless you are going to use your rig as an IF strip for moonbounce (I did with an Omni-D) or 160 meter CW, you will find the 250 Hz too narrow to be very useful. Stacked 500's (; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00044.html (8,455 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: wa2yjf@optonline.net (Tom Provost); Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 09:41:56 -0500; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00056.html (9,155 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 09:24:53 -0600; I'd suggest a couple of filters for the N-1 and N-2 positions. I have the 1.8KHz SSB filter in the N-1 position, a 500Hz CW filter in the N-2 position and 1.8KHz in the 1.8 slot, 500 Hz CW in the 500; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00057.html (9,147 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: ditzian@alltel.net (ditzian@alltel.net); Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:05:03 -0500; I have followed the thread about narrow filters with interest, but I note that no one has mentioned using very narrow filters on PSK31. The theoretical bandwidth of this slow mode is 50 Hz., and I do; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00061.html (8,501 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 13:33:02 -0600; I've use the narrow filters (250Hz) on PSK31 with excellent results. As to S/N improvement, cut the bandwidth from 500 Hz to 250 Hz and automatically you get a 6dB improvement in S/N. As to stability; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00064.html (9,839 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Next filter? (score: 1): Author: DK2GZ@aol.com (DK2GZ@aol.com); Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:29:07 EST; Hello Tom and the TenTec user group I am using TenTec 500 and 250 in both zf. Also the 1.8 at 6.3 Mhz(generally for rtty) I use the following setup: 500 HZ in 6.3 Mhz 20 meter and above 2 times 500 H; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00065.html (8,471 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]