Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+O2\s+Sweep\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+O2\s+Sweep\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] O2 Sweep (score: 1): Author: Larry DiGioia <listacct@longwire.com>; Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:25:11 -0500; Can I assume that the sweep in the O2 uses some processor power, and therefore, if it is turned off, frees up the processor for better performance of "more important stuff?" I am just not real impres; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00086.html (7,199 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] O2 Sweep (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 19:23:45 -0800; I have never seen any difference in performance of the radio with the scope on or off, and like you, I don't find it all that useful. That may be because I have never had a radio with a band scope be; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00089.html (8,831 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] O2 Sweep (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:30:54 -0600; Hi Ron, I'm curious what you find you like about the ICOM 'scope? I was over at a friend's house and their ProIII had the scope running and it was sweeping at about a 2 Hz rate - a far cry from the O; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00090.html (9,858 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] O2 Sweep (score: 1): Author: "Gary Strong" <gjstrong@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:36:01 -0600; Duane, I had a Icom ProIII prior to my Orion II. I'm not sure what the scope was set to when you looked at your friends rig, but I can say that the ProIII scope works a light year or two better than; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00091.html (7,579 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]