Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+O2\s+Tx\s+Audio\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:24:43 -0500
I have listened to several O2's and while the audio may be acceptable, It is not the qualtiy robust audio put out by the orignal Orion running 1.xxx firmware. This is a purely subjective comment and
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00131.html (7,476 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:34:09 EST
I want the same high quality audio that I had with 1.371..... PERIOD. Didn't they test all of that during development???? I'm sure they have an original Orion to compare to. Maybe rewriting the code
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00134.html (7,439 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:38:06 -0500
There is no Orion II beta test group. The beta test group was just for the Orion with version 2. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: <Kc
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00136.html (8,400 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:47:53 EST
Well, that's unfortunate, as I think they did a superb job in early testing. Really taking the place of a department for TT. Now TT is going to have to do a lot better on there own in QC and regressi
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00138.html (7,611 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:45:12 -0800
Maybe they need to bring Doug Smith, KF6DX back for a consult. Ron Castro Chief Technical Officer Results Radio, LLC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00163.html (8,771 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Harwood" <scotth@hsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 07:40:55 -0500
I have received nothing but compliments on my tx audio using Orion II and Studio One mike. As with almost everything else with the Orion II, it takes some study and care setting it up. I plugged a ca
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00182.html (10,205 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 05:20:39 -0800 (PST)
I get many compliments on my transmit audio as well. I use the stock Ten Tec mike, the 706A with stock settings. I am quite pleased with it. I am quite pleased with all aspects of the radio including
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00185.html (12,140 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:08:04 -0600
I found I had to re-EQ the radio and tweak the audio chain slightly from where things were set on my Orion, but can't say the audio doesn't sound "robust". I feed mic audio through a processor into
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00188.html (9,066 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 08:56:54 -0800
Care to share your settings? I tried running a frequency response test last night, and determined that there is no way to measure it on the O2 since, even at low levels of input it "hunts" for the si
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00201.html (12,912 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Harwood" <scotth@hsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:04:22 -0500
Sure! Settings for "Normal" Speech Processor 2 Mic Gain 37 Tx Eq -20 TX Filter Width 2850 Hz L.F. Rollofff 210 Hz For "DX" Speech Processor 4 Mic Gain 37 Tx Eq -20 TX Filter Width 2700 Hz L.F. Rollof
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00218.html (14,342 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:10:49 -0800
I'll try that tonight and see how it sounds, but -20 dB on the EQ sounds pretty radical Ron Castro Chief Technical Officer Results Radio, LLC _______________________________________________ TenTec ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00227.html (8,993 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Don and Diana Cunningham" <wb5hak@duracom.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:03:10 -0600
Ron, I use -18 on TX eq because that's what the group I am in liked with the PR-40. I do have a deep voice, but thought that might be radical too! 73, Don, WB5HAK ____________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00231.html (8,426 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Harwood" <scotth@hsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 18:48:08 -0500
Remember that is for the Studio One mike, which has an enormous bass response. Scott -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net> Reply-To: Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net>,Discussion of Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00233.html (9,806 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: W4ABW@aol.com
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 20:57:20 EST
I just worked ON4UN in the contest at 3736/3854. Simply spectacular audio and John confirmed he is using Orion. WOW ! what beautiful TX sound. Al W4ABW _______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00236.html (7,938 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 02:24:45 EST
I just worked ON4UN in the contest at 3736/3854. Simply spectacular audio and John confirmed he is using Orion. WOW ! what beautiful TX sound. Al W4ABW _______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00247.html (8,264 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] O2 Tx Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Mary Ann Higgins" <mahiggins@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:25:47 -0500
Worked 12 stations on 75 meters @ around 08:00Z last night. Received rave reports & rec audio was great. Using 2.055 with Heil-5 - Settings- Mic 60,SP 3-7,no Eq Lf 150 and Width 2700. 73's Ray W1JUS.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00258.html (9,503 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu