Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\-VI\s+Plus\s+features\s+lost\s+from\s+OMNI\-V\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\-VI\s+Plus\s+features\s+lost\s+from\s+OMNI\-V\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: 00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu (00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:13:05 -0500 (EST); I plan on buying an OMNI-VI Plus before the contests arrive this fall. While reviewing the QST reviews of the OMNI V, VI and VI Plus, together with the filter info from International Radio and the di; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00543.html (10,317 bytes)
2. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:48:31 -0500; Somehow with my Corsair II, I find I prefer rag chewing with the BPT set for about 1.8 Khz pass band, rolling off the higher frequencies. I do that to cut out noise and QRM. I don't know about rag ch; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00545.html (9,331 bytes)
3. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: n1eu@yahoo.com (N1EU); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 08:57:24 -0700 (PDT); Hi Terry, I'm sure a bunch of the guys on the reflector can respond with some good input on these points. A few comments based on my experience: No monitor on the VI. There is a proposed mod that I'v; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00546.html (10,936 bytes)
4. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: supton@eece.maine.edu (Shawn Upton); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 12:01:44 -0400; I've got a couple of questions about filters and PBT: One, ringing: what does this refer to? Two, the club station that I belong to (and is my only current access to HF) has a Corsair; I've noticed t; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00547.html (9,012 bytes)
5. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: JimN0OCT@aol.com (JimN0OCT@aol.com); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 12:59:58 EDT; Yes, there is a mod for this. It was supplied to the TT list about two years ago. It consists of a couple of capacitors and resistors, if I recall correctly. It was supplied by the guys at TT. Anybod; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00550.html (9,029 bytes)
6. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: pcuellar@mail.bright.net (pcuellar@mail.bright.net); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:35:40 -0400; On my Corsair, I typically run the PBT with the pointer at about the 10 o'clock position when on SSB. It seems to smooth out the voices on receive. I'm not sure if all Corsairs are the same, or if my; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00551.html (10,249 bytes)
7. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: wdcook@ibm.net (Bill Cook); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:41:13 -0400; The 10 pole InRad filters have a 6-60 of 1.4. With both filters installed (9mc IF & 6mc IF) the sharpness (sp?) of the PBT is, how shall I say it, very sweet!!! Now add the InRad 2.1 to N2 (9mc IF) a; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00558.html (10,048 bytes)
8. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@starlinx.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:07:37 +0100; Your comment about all of those poles caught me eye (sort of made me think of fishing too!). Back in the days of the OMNI C or Corsair, TT ads used to 'brag' about the ultimate attenuation in their r; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00560.html (11,602 bytes)
9. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 18:35:05 -0500; for not having big-time contesters don't operate SSB. ;-) dale, kg5u -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00565.html (8,417 bytes)
10. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: cshyde@yahoo.com (Carl Hyde); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 06:45:55 -0700 (PDT); Lets talk about contesters. Hmmmm they sit at a radio and call cq, exchange call letters and a signal report and go on to the next cq. Whats the point? That isn't communications its headhunting. Pers; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00594.html (10,085 bytes)
11. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (dacalvin@us.ibm.com); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 08:54:15 -0500; Carl Hyde spake saying: "Lets talk about contesters. Hmmmm they sit at a radio and call cq, exchange call letters and a signal report and go on to the next cq. Whats the point?" Well, for this DXer,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00597.html (8,914 bytes)
12. [TenTec] OMNI-VI Plus features lost from OMNI-V? (score: 1): Author: k4ldr@hitter.net (Pete K4LDR); Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 18:52:03 -0400; Ahoy Ten-Tecers: Contesting has many points; all gud for the participants. Not any gud for the non-participants. To me it is the gud old competitive effort and a therapy that helps my maintain my mot; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00634.html (9,813 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]