Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+\&\s+CW\-80\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+\&\s+CW\-80\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI VI & CW-80 (score: 1): Author: w3uls@3n.net (John Rippey); Date: Fri Aug 1 14:28:47 2003; I'm using an OMNI VI (Opt. 3) tied directly (no Transmatch) to a RadioWorks Carolina Windom CW-80. The built-in meter shows an SWR of 2.0:1 or less on 80-10 meters except 2 1/2:1 on 30 meters. This s; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00007.html (7,025 bytes)
2. [TenTec] OMNI VI & CW-80 (score: 1): Author: SteveBaron@StarLinX.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM); Date: Fri Aug 1 16:16:56 2003; Put a meter in and check for a difference. RadioWorks; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00009.html (7,738 bytes)
3. [TenTec] OMNI VI & CW-80 (score: 1): Author: digalbo@erols.com (Dennis DiGalbo); Date: Fri Aug 1 16:51:30 2003; John, For reference, I'm using my Omni 6+ with a CW-40, the 40 meter version of the Carolina Windom. SWR is under 2:1 on 40, 20 and 10 ... need to use my TT 238 antenna tuner on the other bands. A fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00010.html (7,765 bytes)
4. [TenTec] OMNI VI & CW-80 (score: 1): Author: N4NT_Mike.Hyder@charter.net (Mike Hyder --N4NT--); Date: Fri Aug 1 18:37:47 2003; Yeah, don't borrow trouble. If it works, don't fix it. 73, Mike N4NT RadioWorks; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00012.html (7,634 bytes)
5. [TenTec] OMNI VI & CW-80 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri Aug 1 21:21:35 2003; First thoughts, with and SWR of less than 2.5:1, I wouldn't worry about it. With the SWR being 2.5:1 you should have about 100 watts or so forward and about 17 watts reflected. At HF with reasonable; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00014.html (8,256 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]