Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+FILTERS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+FILTERS\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI VI filters (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 07:33:18 -0500; Hi all 99% of my operating is cw chasing dx. I always use the 250 Hz 282 filter and I think I want to add a 250Hz 9 MHz 219 filter to give me more selectivity. Does anyone use this combination and ho; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00046.html (7,307 bytes)
2. [TenTec] OMNI VI filters (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 09:59:35 -0700; I have used this combination and it works well within its limits. The PBT becomes very sensitive and you need to be very close to the 750 Hz offset in order to hear anything. The other limit is that; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00049.html (8,191 bytes)
3. [TenTec] OMNI VI filters (score: 1): Author: k8mn@clinet.fi (Dave Heil); Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 19:01:24 +0100; Clark and all, With regard to losing gain with the 250 Hz narrow filter and having to set the passband tuning to 750 Hz, it just ain't so. You set the offset to be whatever you want it to be. Mine is; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00050.html (8,821 bytes)
4. [TenTec] OMNI VI filters (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 17:27:23 -0500; Hi all, Not much response to my question about the 219 filter. One doesn't like it, one says it is ok but doesn't use it and one likes it. Anybody else use the 250 KHz 9 MHz filter with the 250 KHz 6; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00051.html (7,306 bytes)
5. [TenTec] OMNI VI filters (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 14:04:20 -0700; Yes, the manual tells you where to place the jumper to equalize the gain. But, no, it doesn't equalize the gain, especially for the pair of 250 Hz filters. I have experienced this on several OMNI VI; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00055.html (8,459 bytes)
6. [TenTec] OMNI VI Filters (score: 1): Author: w5ec@digitalexp.com (Hawkins, Bill); Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 15:16:30 -0500; Hi All My question regarding using 2 250 khz filters didn't draw many positive responses, but I think I still want to try it. Anybody have a spare 219 filter they don't want? Price? Bill W5EC -- FAQ; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-08/msg00077.html (7,230 bytes)
7. [TenTec] OMNI VI FILTERS (score: 1): Author: yash@aol.com; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:39:41 -0400; QUICK QUESTION, JUST BOUGHT A OMNI VI WITH THE OPTION 1 UPGRADE. Since I haven't got the rig yet and there is no where to download the manual I had a question about the filters. I gather the rig came; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00265.html (6,904 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI FILTERS (score: 1): Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:16:24 -0700; No. Stock is with a pair of 8 pole filters at about 2.4 KHz each. CW/Narrow SSB filters were options. That's about right. Without option 3 (or a true OMNI VI plus) you have one option in the 9 MHz IF; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00275.html (8,389 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI FILTERS (score: 1): Author: yash@aol.com; Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 08:57:35 -0400; Clark thanks for the filter info. When setup will look for you on 40. thanks dale k8qi No. Stock is with a pair of 8 pole filters at about 2.4 KHz each. CW/Narrow SSB filters were options. That's abo; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00280.html (9,002 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI FILTERS (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:40:04 -1000; Hi Dale, I will tell you what I know about Omni VI IF filter possibilities. All Omni VI versions have a 15 kHz BW 2 pole crystal filter as the 1st filter in the 9 MHz IF. This filter is in the receiv; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00303.html (10,072 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 21:12:03 -0500; Hi everyone, After adjusting the BFO and TCXO and using the Omni VI for SSB and digital modes for a little over a week now, I kind of like the new to me rig. I noticed a +2 or so S unit change when s; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00009.html (7,658 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Dukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 21:21:24 -0500; Your 2.4 KHz filter COULD be bad but most likely the gain select is set for a CW filter. The optional filter slots have a jumper select for added gain when a CW filter is enabled, to compensate for i; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00010.html (8,522 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 21:31:48 -0500; Gary Hi Gary, I doubt the 2.4 Kc or .5 Kc filters are bad. I have another 1.8 Kc and .5 Kc filter. Same results with either filters. I'll check the jumper. Thanks 73 Stan KM4HQE _____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00011.html (7,513 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Dukes HiFi <dukeshifi@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 22:13:09 -0500; The jumper is the most likely root cause Gary _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00012.html (8,282 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <kenradiobrown@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 17:58:17 -1000; It all depends on a lot of things. For one thing there are filter loss compensation jumpers in the Omni VI, but I think those are only for the 9 MHz filters, not for the 6.3 MHz IF filters. The other; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00013.html (9,561 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Stan Gammons <s_gammons@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 00:34:22 -0500; The other thing that really matters is the spectral distribution of the noise and signal power within the filter bandpass. For example if the power of the noise or the signal is distributed uniforml; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00014.html (8,215 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <kenradiobrown@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:08:35 -1000; It is unclear to me whether you are talking about the NAR or N1, N2 filters in the 9 MHz IF or the Filters in the 6.3 MHz Pass Band Tuning IF. In either case there is something not quite right. If th; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00015.html (10,284 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Greg S via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 11:25:47 +0000 (UTC); Stan....my Omni VI Plus has the same action as yours. When I hit the 1.8 button, signal narrows, and gain jumps noticeably. I've actually come to like it. I have hearing loss, and on past rigs, narro; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00016.html (9,292 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: s_gammons@charter.net; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 06:41:20 -0500; Hi Greg, I have hearing loss also. The increase in gain is fine with me. I just wondered if it was normal. Thanks for your reply. 73 Stan KM4HQE On Aug 7, 2017, 6:26 AM -0500, Greg S via TenTec <tent; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00017.html (9,852 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI filters (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 08:12:58 -0400; It is not normal. Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00018.html (10,784 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]