Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+PLUS\s+Owners\s+\&\s+Harley\s+owners\-Reply\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+PLUS\s+Owners\s+\&\s+Harley\s+owners\-Reply\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI VI PLUS Owners & Harley owners-Reply (score: 1): Author: PEPLASTERS@mail.rkd.snds.com (Paul Plasters); Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 13:24:44 -0500; I have never had another station tell me that My Kenwood, or Icom sounded great. There was never any discussion much about that item. Until I got a Ten Tec that is. About every third or fourth contac; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00166.html (7,908 bytes)
2. [TenTec] OMNI VI PLUS Owners & Harley owners-Reply (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner WA3JPG); Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 12:29:35 -0700; I own mostly Ten Tec. I am not a "fan" however, and from my vantage point I see the Ten Tec design philosophy as one of certain engineering tradeoffs - made differently than the Japanese rigs. Now,; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00167.html (9,004 bytes)
3. Re[2]: [TenTec] OMNI VI PLUS Owners & Harley owners-Reply (score: 1): Author: Reid_W_Simmons@ccm2.hf.intel.com (Reid W Simmons); Date: Mon, 20 Oct 97 10:15:00 PDT; Text item: Well, I have had my one and only Ten Tec HF rig (an OMNI VI "enhanced") for a little over 5 years now. For the 31 years prior to that I had dozens of rigs both US and Asian made. I continu; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-10/msg00181.html (11,705 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]