Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+Transmit\s+IMD\s+\[6\+\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\s+Transmit\s+IMD\s+\[6\+\]\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: hondo@kscable.com (Steve M); Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 21:35:23 -0500; I just reread the qst reveiw of the 6+. They were not happy with their measurements so they got another one. It was better except on 80 meters where it still missed 30db down by 3db. The first one wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00420.html (9,949 bytes)
2. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 23:04:40 -0400; I wonder if all you guys ever operate your radios or just sit around running tests on them. Mike meters 30db of the over about From: "John Rippey" <w3uls@3n.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> I'm inste; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00421.html (10,165 bytes)
3. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 20:32:24 -0700 (PDT); Heck, I haven't been part of this, but now I must speak up! Its true. I don't operate much at all. I mostly run lots of tests and repeatedly compare my OMNI VI to other radios. Somehow, it is what I; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00423.html (8,947 bytes)
4. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 22:44:14 -0500; Mike, I guess it is no excuse to those who prefer to operate most of the time, but as a retired engineer, I have a great deal of curiosity about the equipment that I use. So I devise tests using my r; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00424.html (10,315 bytes)
5. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: hondo@kscable.com (Steve M); Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 23:15:29 -0500; I don't need to run a test on my radio to quote qst. I use my 6+ every day. I would certainly like it better if the transmitter was even nearly as clean as such ancients as the Yaesu Ft-102 or the Ke; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00426.html (11,979 bytes)
6. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Mike Hyder -N4NT-); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:00:32 -0400; I just had visions of a guy buying a television set, hauling it home, taking it apart and running endless tests to see if it does as Consumer Reports said it does. Or buying a car and setting it up t; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00429.html (11,216 bytes)
7. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 10:16:35 -0500; Well, Mike, I think that you are exaggerating for the sake of humor. <:} Some of the simple things that I have done with the PRO, as well as my other radios, are 1. measure the transmit power bandwid; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00436.html (11,912 bytes)
8. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 15:30:35 -0400; The real problem is we don't have a consumer reports to look at! We only have QST, and they sure aren't nearly as thorough. The automotive equivalent of the modern rig problems we are discussing are; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00441.html (10,264 bytes)
9. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 16:00:09 -0400; We only have QST? What are CQ, 73, and Worldradio, chopped liver? 73, ron wn3vaw "There's No Crying in Baseball!" -- Jimmie Dugan, "A League of Their Own" The real problem is we don't have a consumer; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00442.html (10,932 bytes)
10. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 15:33:20 -0500; Mostly, yes, in terms of reasonably detailed, creditable lab tests. While the opinions about new equipment in CQ, 73 and World Radio are interesting to read, they are only that: opinions. And they co; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00443.html (10,541 bytes)
11. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 19:04:35 -0400; Well, that was an interesting set of replies. Especially in consideration of a thread earlier this week on test results from the ARRL Lab. On the one hand, we have those who will rely on the reviews; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00445.html (12,233 bytes)
12. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 22:49:49 -0400; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00450.html (9,000 bytes)
13. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 22:49:50 -0400; The ARRL lab is actually almost too immune to external feedback of any type. People aren't correct in saying they bend to manufacturer's will, so far as test results go. While I don't think the meth; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00451.html (10,184 bytes)
14. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: n2ka@optonline.net (Arthur Bernstein); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 23:36:07 -0400; Whether you like QST's methodology or if their intentions are altruistic or if they are "cuddling up" to their advertisers, they are still light years ahead of CQ and any other publication in the tho; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00453.html (12,308 bytes)
15. [TenTec] OMNI VI Transmit IMD [6+] (score: 1): Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 23:29:24 -0500; Art, we are singing from the same page of the same hymnal. While I enjoy reading the reviewer's personal comments about trying out a new piece of gear, I find it disappointing that the magazine does; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00455.html (10,421 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]