Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VII\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VII\s*$/: 96 ]

Total 96 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:08:34 -0400; can't wait till Ten Tec posts a photo... and then the debate on the color of the trim rings will begin. mike Mike, WB8VGE SunLight Energy Systems The Heathkit Shop http://www.theheathkitshop.com/ J e; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00109.html (6,929 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: JohnCrux <jac.trademarks@tiscali.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:34:22 +0100; If the Omni VII announcement is not a long delayed echo from April 1, you guys are missing the point. Will my XYL like the colour ? Never mind the software - its time to consider fundamental issues l; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00132.html (7,251 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:19:01 +0000; some rather amusing comments here on Ten Tec pricing and the new innovative Omni VII. Pricing: When was the last time Ten Tec had a sale? No, not sale on used stuff, or demo items, or one of those on; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00175.html (9,024 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:44:44 -0500 (CDT); At one time when they still had a dealer network in the early/mid-1980's, Ten-Tec had a free upgrade from the 4-pole crystal filter to the 8-pole. OK, so it may not be much, but the point is that it; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00176.html (10,142 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:08:06 -0400; (JA Mfrs give you a mic every time). Icom products are routinely The above is a classic example of "marketing psychology", Now that he's hooked, they'll play him like a fish. When he's finally on lan; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00177.html (8,363 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com; Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 15:19:07 -0400; We have such short memories... It was common knowledge for years that JA manufacturers were subsidized by their government... it is most likely still that way. US mfr's are not subsidized... the only; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00178.html (8,316 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:56:12 -0500; Plugged directly into an Ethernet port of a router? I think not. I don't get the tone of some of the responses! 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA _______________________________________________ TenTec m; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00185.html (7,537 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 09:36:41 -0700; In all fairness to TT and other American manufacturers, the value of the US Dollar relative to the Japanese Yen increased 44% between 1995 and the end of 2005, and during the same period, we saw a 28; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00225.html (11,089 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Pete Juliano" <jessystems@cablespeed.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 13:14:01 -0700; Did I miss something --are there actually photos? The official TT website didn't show any or maybe as usual I missed them. 73's Pete W6JFR _______________________________________________ TenTec maili; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00287.html (7,694 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 17:05:49 -0500; As reported in an earlier posting, two photos are here: http://www.n9vv.com/ten-tec-omni-vii.html Did I miss something --are there actually photos? The official TT website didn't show any or maybe as; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00292.html (8,426 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:07:04 -0500; great omni 7,,, hi end performance with a lower price point , and great performance !!!! This will be a FANTASTICALLY POPULAR RADIO... and since it'll be in a more popular pricepoint area, it will st; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00317.html (8,246 bytes)
12. [TenTec] omni vII (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:51:06 -0400; Hello all , I have been away for a while , Is there any news about the new Omni VII ? John kb2huk _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://list; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00502.html (6,416 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Omni vii (score: 1): Author: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 20:16:01 -0700; Hi all...have a slightly used Omni 7 comming in a couple of weeks. I want to use a common power supply (35 amp homebrew) feeding a bank of gas absorption batteries at 13.6 to 13.8 vdc to a MFJ dc fus; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00163.html (7,634 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Omni vii (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 08:01:20 -0400; The Omni 7 is the first Tentec radio to have the overcurrent shutoff circuit in the radio instead of the power supply. You will not need any circuit breaker or special shutdown circuit with the Omni; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00164.html (8,856 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls73@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:58:52 -0400; I'm intrigued by the lack of comments on the July QST review of the OMNI VII. It's a very good radio, if a bit pricey, for everyday ham use, and I would have thought there would be discussion of the; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00337.html (7,372 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:09:54 -0600; The reveiw was discussed quite a bit when it first appeared on the ARRL web page a few weeks ago. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00338.html (7,874 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:23:31 -0500; John, it might be that the early release of the Rob Sherwood took the wind out of the sails. Did we learn anything new from the ARRL report? Personally, I do not need ARRL labs to test and report on; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00339.html (8,501 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:21:22 -0500; You might check the Omni-VII group over on Yahoo. I think the apparent lack of discussion is more that the radio turned out to be what about everyone expected, i.e., a good radio and no real surpris; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00342.html (7,113 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: JOHN <ku3g@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:01:32 -0700 (PDT); The reveiw was discussed quite a bit when it first appeared on the ARRL web page a few weeks ago. 73, Jerry, K0CQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00344.html (8,255 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII (score: 1): Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:56:02 -0400; I asked this a couple of months ago, but maybe I asked too early, so let me try again: How does this radio compare, *performance-wise*, to an Omni VI Option 3? Unless I really need the Internet featu; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00345.html (7,752 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]