Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+BCI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+BCI\s*$/: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 19:44:48 -0400; I never said the Orion had a "design flaw". That would amount to the crime of heresy on this reflector. No, the Orion is just rather typical when it comes to being connected to MY loop. Yes it's a fu; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00549.html (12,657 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: Eric Rosenberg <wd3q@starpower.net>; Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 21:21:18 -0400; I've been following the thread on BCI to the Orion with both interest and amusement. I live in Washington, DC proper, 5.5 miles from a 50kw AM station operating at 1500 kHz (signal measured a -10 dBm; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00555.html (10,323 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 21:47:50 -0500; Eric: Were you able to determine if the 160M / BC interference from the stations was fundamental overload or IM? I've found both to exists however, many times the source is external to the radio and; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00562.html (13,199 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 21:51:15 -0500; OOPS! Darn reflector software got me again. This was meant as comments to the originator. Sorry folks. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00563.html (14,377 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 09:00:57 -0400; Hi Eric -- We have an AM station about 2 miles from the W1KM site. It's small but runs 5 kW during the day on 1420... enough to mess up antenna analyzers hooked to the low band verticals... and enoug; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00597.html (11,429 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 13:17:02 -1000; Hi Eric, When I first started operating 160 meters, it was at a club station site which had a full quarter wavelength base insulated tower. We used that tower for transmit only, because the MWBC QRM; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00611.html (15,289 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:12:40 -0500; To get the most out of one's equipment, one must approach operation questions with an open mind; rather than just bad mouthing the equipment. Some folks don't really want to find fixes; just to vent.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00640.html (9,298 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:06:55 -0400; However, my Omni VI and TS-480 neither require any kind of external filtering for BCI while the Orion was totally useless, along with a lot of other rigs. Call this bad mouthing or whatever you want; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00643.html (10,313 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:21:40 -0500; A fact is just that -- a fact. But the way the "facts" are presented, by the small group that Bill referred to, is usually "badmouthing" in tone and substance, and largely rehashing old news. I'll n; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00644.html (9,560 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:02:36 EDT; as a new owner of an orion, I have been following some discussions on this reflector.... I see some of the dissatifaction some folks have for the radio. I maybe want to bring up a simple point. regar; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00645.html (10,501 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: Al Baker <w5iz@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:17:14 -0700 (PDT); Tom, 6AJR refers to something that will "get up in the morning and make you breakfast". What is it? Is it the IC7800 or FT9000? I sure would like to know as I am getting tired of fixing my own breakf; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00646.html (8,956 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:34:41 -0500; Are you sure you're on the most recent firmware release? Mine makes a big breakfast of flapjacks, eggs, and pan-fried trout every morning. There was an early firmware release that occasionally under; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00648.html (8,765 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:39:11 -0400; Some people have trouble with BCI on the Orion, but most people don't. Of course, if you've got it, it's important to you. What would be very helpful, at this point, are some simple engineering tests; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00649.html (8,940 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: "Tony Martin W4FOA" <w4foa@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:45:08 -0400; Grant, They must have two recent firmware releases? Sounds like you didn't get the "southern version"? pan fried trout. You might want to check with the TT "boys", hi. Tony, W4FOA ___________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00650.html (9,587 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:22:41 -0700; Seriously, at my current QTH every piece of Ten-Tec gear that I use (Omni-VI+, Paragon, Corsair II, Omni-C, Jupiter, RX-350, Scout, and Century 21 suffer from highly objectionalble BCI from the two f; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00653.html (9,712 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:46:09 -0400; Ahhhhh Haaaaaaaa......YOU must be one of the 12 complainers? Shame on you... Tommy W4BQF However, my Omni VI and TS-480 neither require any kind of external filtering for BCI while the Orion was tota; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00655.html (10,975 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] ORION BCI (score: 1): Author: "John Gwin" <jtgwin@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:21:57 -0500; And you may notice, Grant, that its always the same people, over and over, ad nauseum. My favorites are the ones who no longer even own an Orion. -W4SK _______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00659.html (10,667 bytes)
38. [TenTec] Orion BCI (score: 1): Author: "Joseph Trombino Jr" <w2kj@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:10:41 -0400; Been reading all this traffic on BCI problems that the Orion suffers from. No problems noted at my QTH, but then I'm not sure where the major broadcast transmitters are located relative to my locatio; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00664.html (8,419 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Orion BCI (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:14:22 EDT; Could it be the Orion has a more sensitive reciever.. Been reading all this traffic on BCI problems that the Orion suffers from. No problems noted at my QTH, but then I'm not sure where the major bro; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00669.html (8,278 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Orion BCI (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:43:31 -0500; Joe, It is one of the most sensitive radios, that is why it may receive close in RFI. Even the best of dynamic range radios can be impaled with too much RF from a close source, or two sources if it i; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00675.html (8,353 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2]