Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+QRQ\s+Performance\s+$long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+QRQ\s+Performance\s+$long$\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:13:26 -0000; The recent discussions concerning abilities of Orion in QRQ have sparked my interest and have prompted me to conduct a few tests. For those that are interested I set out my findings here. Firstly, le; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00865.html (10,171 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:26:55 -0400; ... Hi Bob, several months (and revisions) earlier, I performed detailed measurements and found that quality of transmitted CW greatly varied with code speed, time between characters/words and especi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00866.html (7,527 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:36:15 -0700 (PDT); Was WriteLog generating CW via the serial Port? Or was a MK-1100 Multi-Keyer being used? The Multi-Keyer was designed do alleviate various CW timming issues when using trying to use a PC's serial por; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00868.html (9,107 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: Martin Ewing <martin@aa6e.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:40:27 -0400; 5B4AGN's results with high-speed CW are fascinating to me, not because I ever expect to work over 40 wpm CW, or even 30 wpm, but because of what it says about the Orion's design. There's been a lot o; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00869.html (7,908 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:31:38 -0000; Writelog generated the CW using a W5XD Multi-keyer which I rely on for SO2R control and generation of clean stutter free code. The Multi-keyer accepts asynchronous high speed ascii from a com port an; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00872.html (8,789 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:48:30 -0000; Martin I think you are very probably correct but as my tests show Orion produces acceptable code up to 60 wpm, how much of a problem is this? Certainly for avid fans of 60+ wpm this is a problem but; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00886.html (8,749 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:42:24 -1000; Martin I think you are very probably correct but as my tests show Orion produces acceptable code up to 60 wpm, how much of a problem is this? Certainly for avid fans of 60+ wpm this is a problem but; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00891.html (8,731 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]