Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+ll\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+ORION\s+ll\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion ll (score: 1): Author: "Michael Falzone" <k4psp@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:44:13 -0500; For sale Orion ll in mint condition 8 months old.with optional 1.8 roofing filter installed $ 3,850 plus shipping.If interested please email me directly at. k4psp@nc.rr.com Mike k4psp _______________; /archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00341.html (6,570 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Orion ll (score: 1): Author: "Gene Henderson" <wb9hla@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:13:09 -0400; If anyone is interested in an Orion ll I will be selling one at the Peoria Hamfest this weekend. Location N12 Ser# 06c10265. Gene WB9HLA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00271.html (6,508 bytes)
3. [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Bob Gibson <w5rg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:32:52 -0700 (PDT); Hi Fellows. I have a new Orionll and I just cannot get the audio right...everyone says I'm to wide and that I'm over driving it..I cut it down to 2.1 bw and cut the mic gain so low that it just puts; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00234.html (6,904 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:04:01 -0500; If you've cut the BW down to 2.1 KHz then that is the bandwidth. Now, what is likely taking place is that you are using excessive processing or the mike gain is too high or you are overdriving the in; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00235.html (10,157 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:13:39 -0500; On the Behringer B-1, I have 4 of them. They work great miking the church choir. Lousy radio mikes however. A good dynamic operated about 1" to 2" from the mouth and on axis will sound much better. P; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00236.html (11,472 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:55:08 -0700; It sounds like something else is going on here. You should be able to open the TX BW to at least 3.0 kHz and drive the mic input until the ALC light is on quite a bit and there should be no audible d; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00238.html (9,128 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:55:59 -0400; Hi Fellows. I have a new Orionll and I just cannot get the audio right... I'm using a Behringer B-1 Mic and a VX2000... _______________________________________________ My thoughts parallel what the; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00239.html (11,531 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 01:56:53 -0400; I also have one and I agree. As you know, Bob, many of those large diaphragm studio microphones are very sensitive, and as another ham once put it, they pick up the sound of a gnat's sneeze from acro; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00240.html (8,503 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:54:39 +0000; I disagree - although the B-1 may (or may not) be a lousy ham mic, it shouldn't sound distorted with the VX-2000 as long as levels are set properly and you're driving the AUX audio input. I used a VX; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00242.html (9,051 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:30:24 -0400; Hi Barry - I may not have been sufficiently clear and your post causes me to pause and clarify: I agree the VR-2000 processor, itself, should not cause distortion - unless used improperly or with ina; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00245.html (9,346 bytes)
11. [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Bob Gibson <w5rg@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:15:32 -0700 (PDT); Great fellows..Thanks for all the advice on the radio..Just to answer a few questions..This is a new radio from the factory..one week old..I do not run the speech processer at all..I was told that I; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00247.html (8,676 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:36:33 -0500 (CDT); I think you'd like the sound of the 709 or the 707 as used with that radio. They are different styles of mikes and you may have a preference in that regard. The internal speech processor when used is; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00249.html (10,786 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:18:15 -0400; A few thoughts... 1) It is possible you were given bad advice in the beginning. Saying your signal is "wide" is a somewhat vague, unscientific term; it hardly qualifies as a "term of art" all operato; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00251.html (12,872 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:20:41 -0500; I basically agree with James, "what's wide?". How was it determined that it was wide? If the TX BW is 2800 Hz and the TX Low End Roll-off is 150 Hz then the transmitted bandwidth is 2650 Hz. In gener; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00253.html (10,713 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Rick W <ve7tk@yahoo.ca>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:27:50 -0700 (PDT); Minor correction. With a TX BW of 2800 and a roll off of 150 the top end is actually at 2950 Hz. I think that too would be quite acceptable. 73, Rick VE7TK Website: http://www.ve7tk.com I basically; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00254.html (9,510 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:38:42 +0200; Hold your horses Rick... ! This is unacceptable on the 60m band where FCC regulations limit the maximum transmitted bandwidth to 2.8 kHz. (see: http://www.arrl.org/60-meter-faq/ ) This is unacceptabl; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00255.html (10,635 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:38:38 +0000; Re-read Rick's post. The bandwidth IS 2.8KHz. The passband extends from 150-2950hz 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://list; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00256.html (12,449 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:54:36 +0000; Except there ISN'T a bandwidth setting of 2800 Hz available on the Orion - you'd have to choose either 2700 or 2850 Hz. Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00257.html (12,707 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:00:11 -0400; The objection is misplaced, because Bob couched his original comment with the proviso "if"... such that 2800 Hz was stated merely as an example, or hypothetical case, and not proffered as a rule. ;-); /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00258.html (8,471 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] ORION ll (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:21:22 +0200; Bob, Next time somebody says you are too wide, ask him for specifics. Too wide? How wide? Too wide compared to what? How exactly did he determine that? Maybe you were too strong and he had too crappy; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00263.html (9,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]