Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+7300\s+buy\s+back\s+program\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:24:50 +0200
I know lots of hams like to brag on their new radio but the new does wear off. Many of the users are not satisfied - for whatever reason - and have buyer's remorse. One German retailer has a trade-up
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00077.html (8,303 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 00:38:44 -0700
It's easy to see why, having owned the K3/P3 for a long time, one of the radios whose features this one tries (and fails badly) to emulate. It's billed as an SDR with knobs plus a touch screen spectr
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00078.html (8,112 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: kd3jf.paulgates@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:15:08 -0400
That is your opinion right? Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00079.html (9,308 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:19:38 +0200
Oh I agree Jim. There's a reason all of these dealers have stock piles of 7600s. However the guy I was listening to who did this is one of those 80m rag chewers, and since many of them operate in "al
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00080.html (9,273 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:26:51 +0200
What are you implying, Paul? I fully agree with Jim for stating known facts, not opinions. These dirty transmitters have been reported on often; just read arrl lab report measurements and check where
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00081.html (10,547 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:22:14 -0400
I think dealers and manufacturers have stock piles of ALL superhets, not just the 7600. I think Rick is on the mark that the DEALER is simply motivated to move excess 7600 inventory. What Rick didn't
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00082.html (11,067 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Scott Harwood <scotthsr@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:47:57 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I concur with Jim on the Kenwood. I replaced my Orion II with a 590SG and I'm extremely pleased with it. I also read in one review the Icom 7300 has some front end overload problems. Just my two cent
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00083.html (11,030 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:29:25 -0700
Of course. You want me to tell you your opinion, or post your opinion as mine? :) 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00084.html (8,584 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 08:44:11 -0700
Clarifying -- it is a FACT that the ICOM 7600 produces nasty key clicks -- that was documented by ARRL Lab tests. Only Yaesu rigs were dirtier. There's a carefully tabulated summary of those results
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00085.html (9,418 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:11:49 -0700
Barry, I don't disagree that all mfrs are looking at direct sampling RX, and I agree that they should be. I'd call that wise investment in R&D. My assessment of the 7300 is that it's a budget level p
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00086.html (10,351 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:29:44 -0400
I contested with both an ANAN-100D and Flex 6500 over the past few years and observed no issues with ADC overload. My issues with those radios is one of ergonomics. I believe their receivers are supe
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00087.html (10,845 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:57:09 -0700
I haven't seen a Flex up close and personal, but I certainly agree about ergonomics with ANAN. I bought a 10E to use as a spectrum analyzer, and it's very good at that. But I found the ergonomics som
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00088.html (10,035 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Spencer <w1gak@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:22:08 -0600
I have watched the transition from analog signal processing to DSP. The results are remarkable, MRI, CAT, SONAR etc. Also playing with SDR. IMHO we aren't there yet. The medical folks are not giving
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00089.html (9,240 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 19:33:04 +0200
Well now I will disagree with Jim "slightly". I don't think Icom over-sold the product; Joe Ham overestimated the radio. I think they let their wishes run away with their understanding. As a kid I dr
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00090.html (13,290 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 19:37:45 +0200
Opinions are like... and we all have them. Here's mine: IMO we ARE there now. At least the technology is. The price is still high but rapidly coming down. You must be careful with the term "SDR". Tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00091.html (10,384 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: kd3jf.paulgates@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:46:31 -0400
Exactly in plain English what is wrong with the 7300 Paul kw4bd Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00092.html (10,887 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Mike Bryce <prosolar@sssnet.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:16:37 -0400
I have a hard time handling over $1500 for a radio and being told its entry level. Nothing like scaring the bejesus out of a new ham who after spending all that money for a rig, he/she ends up with e
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00093.html (9,679 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:28:20 +0200
In plain English Paul, it overloads MUCH too easily. To prevent that, you have to use a lot of attenuation; here in Europe even more than the radio has built in. Then it does not overload but you can
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00094.html (12,456 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:33:45 +0200
Well many of us are in similar financial situations Mike, but all of us can read and we should just simply read what the OEM says/prints and stop dreaming. Direct sampling is a new technology. This i
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00095.html (10,819 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] OT: 7300 buy back program (score: 1)
Author: Tim <tim@ke4ke.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:14:18 -0500
Hi Jim, Found your TXNoise page a few years ago and have shared the link around some. Appreciate the page. It is very helpful. Tim KE4KE It is also a FACT that the Kenwood TS590 radio is a lot cleane
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-08/msg00096.html (11,121 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu