Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OT\:\s+Ground\s+Radials\s+at\s+Tower\s+Base\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
If I add radials on the base of my tower, after adding all my current baluns, will I be able to reduce my noise level a bit more? Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD _____________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00216.html (6,627 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:41:54 -0700
Jim, Not enough information from you to determine an answer. Is the tower a vertical antenna? Or does it support wire horizontal antennas, or beams, or loops, or ? Local noise is often picked up from
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00230.html (8,884 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:45:12 -0700
Jim, that tower comment should have said, "tower NOT in touch with the ground to start with". Sri, Stuart Rohre _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00231.html (7,322 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:46:04 -0400
If you improve your grounding system, you will always be happy that you did. To say it will or will not reduce noise requires knowing a lot more about the specific details of your setup. If there are
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00236.html (8,343 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:16:48 -0700
Ground is NOT a sump into which noise is poured. A connection to earth is NOT a solution to RFI or noise problems. The ONLY benefit of a connection to earth is lightning protection. 73, Jim Brown K9Y
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00237.html (8,249 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:40:09 -0600
The grounding system for a vertical antenna is often deficient. That's easily seen when the antenna SWR is low, but there's no matching network. The perfectly grounded vertical should have a feed poi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00238.html (9,648 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:02:13 -1000
Maybe so, however the question was about adding radials. There is definitely more benefit from adding radials to a vertical antenna system than just improved lightning protection. Perhaps no reducti
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00240.html (8,278 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Derwin Goliver" <dgoliver001@woh.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:52:02 -0400
Well now.... As far as radials go. I like to mount my verticals off the ground. Becouse just a few 1/8 wave off the ground. Is better than many in the ground. If I am not missaken. Some thing like 2
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00242.html (11,449 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:57:35 -0400 (EDT)
Sadly Derwin, you are very "missaken". Do a search on W8JI, or read ON4UN's Low band DXing books to learn how ground system really work. There is "no free lunch" with radial systems. 73 de Billy, AA4
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00243.html (12,908 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:30:33 -0700
With all due respect to W8JI and ON4UN, there has been a lot of more recent research done by commercial AM broadcasters over the past couple of years regarding elevated radial systems for vertical ra
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00245.html (15,795 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:45:10 -0500
Hi Ron, We are not that far apart ... the key is as you mentioned, "special design considerations" ... that's the important piece. Otherwise we end up with 'ham lore' that seems to think that 2 eleva
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00247.html (16,992 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:07:55 -0400
You know that many noise filtering circuits (for power lines, ethernet, RF and etc) use circuits the one half of which is connected to ground. Remove an effective ground connection and you degrade th
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00248.html (10,322 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:55:05 -0700
WRONG! This is one of those confusions we have about multiple uses of the word "ground." A filter does NOT in any way depend on a connection to EARTH to operate. What it DOES need is the connection o
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00249.html (9,699 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Derwin Goliver" <dgoliver001@woh.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:06:27 -0400
OK will do some ck'ing. Hey whille we are on antenna's... Someone know where I can find some info . I am looking to put my 5/8 wave 10 meter gound plane above my TA 33m Mosley. And I dont want it red
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00255.html (14,932 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:33:19 -0600
Worked for me and my dad with a quarter wave vertical about 50 years ago. 5/8 wave is less picky about its ground plane. Or you could tilt the elements on the horizontal beam. 30 degree tilt costs ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00256.html (10,034 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
I need to know why some one said that adding radials would reduce noise on receive. You can view this on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9a1mAAtSbE adds a different point of view of things. I have re
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00257.html (9,861 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:16:20 -0400 (EDT)
Derwin, I would agree with you as to not wanting to reduce the gain or change the TA33's pattern. But I am afraid that removing the radials from the 5/8w will make it worse, not better, unless you fi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00259.html (10,540 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: Mike Gorniak <mgorniak@genesiswireless.us>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:07:29 -0500
Actually, radials are fairly ineffective for lightning protection. What works is ground rods. Last year I worked on an AM radio station that had a full 120 radial ground system at the base of it's to
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00270.html (8,513 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:14:30 -0700
Hi Mike, Intuitively, the radials provide a capacitive connection to earth, while the rods are part of a DC connection that includes both resistance and inductance. As frequency increases, inductance
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00271.html (8,512 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] OT: Ground Radials at Tower Base (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Zond" <k3miy@csonline.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 22:05:18 -0400
Hi I worked at a college FM station where the idea was that a simple rod in the ground would be the only grounding. First storm, and the remote was taken out. With much effort, the chief tech convinc
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00285.html (9,661 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu